...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Pricing decisions and social welfare in a supply chain with multiple competing retailers and carbon tax policy
【24h】

Pricing decisions and social welfare in a supply chain with multiple competing retailers and carbon tax policy

机译:具有多个竞争零售商和碳税政策的供应链中的定价决策和社会福利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates whether implementing carbon tax policy alters supply chain members' pricing decisions and social welfare. We also consider consumer environmental awareness (CEA), which is currently growing, and we focus on the impact of CEA, retail competitive intensity and other factors on the optimal carbon tax rate and social welfare. We address the issue from the point of view of a policy planner whose goal is to maximize social welfare. Additionally, we consider two different market scenarios: a bilateral monopoly situation and a scenario with multiple competing retailers. In terms of the impact on pricing, the retail price and wholesale price increase with the carbon tax rate in both scenarios. The market demand for the retailer that sells a more environmentally friendly product relative to other competing retailers will increase with the carbon tax rate in the scenario with competing retailers. Additionally, the government's carbon tax regulation at the optimal tax rate can effectively improve social welfare when carbon emissions per unit of product are large or the price of carbon dioxide is high in both scenarios, regardless of the extent of CEA. Further, when the competitive strength of an industry in the retail market is high, the government can also implement carbon tax regulation to reduce social welfare losses. Moreover, compared with the monopoly situation, the intuitive carbon tax rate is closer to the optimal carbon tax rate in the competitive situation, and thus, it will be better able to reduce social welfare losses. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文研究了实施碳税政策是否会改变供应链成员的定价决策和社会福利。我们还考虑了目前正在增长的消费者环境意识(CEA),我们关注CEA,零售竞争强度和其他因素对最佳碳税率和社会福利的影响。我们从旨在最大程度地实现社会福利的政策计划者的角度来解决这个问题。此外,我们考虑了两种不同的市场情况:双边垄断情况和具有多个竞争零售商的情况。在对定价的影响方面,在两种情况下,零售价和批发价均随着碳税率的增长而增加。在竞争性竞争对手的情况下,相对于其他竞争性零售商而言,销售更环保产品的零售商的市场需求将增加。此外,在两种情况下,无论CEA的程度如何,当每单位产品的碳排放量较大或二氧化碳的价格较高时,政府以最佳税率制定的碳税法规都可以有效地改善社会福利。此外,当一个行业在零售市场上的竞争力很高时,政府也可以实施碳税法规以减少社会福利损失。而且,与垄断情况相比,直观的碳税率在竞争情况下更接近最优碳税率,因此,将能够更好地减少社会福利损失。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号