首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >The impacts of governmental performance assessment policy and citizen participation on improving environmental performance across Chinese provinces
【24h】

The impacts of governmental performance assessment policy and citizen participation on improving environmental performance across Chinese provinces

机译:政府绩效评估政策和公民参与对改善中国各省环境绩效的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although existing studies have paid a great deal of attention to the impact of government policy instruments on environmental governance, they failed to explore the relationships and differential effects of major government instruments on environmental performance. In this study, the panel data of 31 Chinese provinces over the 2004-2015 are utilized to investigate the impacts of performance assessment and public participation on environmental performance. Statistical data of four kinds of pollutants emissions were used to measure environmental performance. We collected the performance assessment data from China's Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, and the official statistical yearbook data of petitions and environmental non-governmental organizations were used to measure public participation. We empirically confirm that performance assessment is only significantly correlated with binding high-visibility environmental pollutant emissions (e.g., sulfur dioxide), while it exhibits less influence on low-visibility binding environmental pollutant emissions (e.g., chemical oxygen demand). Public participation has differential effects on environmental performance. Environmental petitions are significantly correlated with non-binding environmental pollutants (e.g., industrial wastewater). However, environmental non-governmental organizations do not exhibit statistically significant effects on environmental pollutant emissions. Compared with the 11th Five-Year Plan, the environmental performance assessment in 12th Five-Year Plan is more effective. This analysis implies that China should optimize the governmental approach both for the performance assessment and public participation to respond effectively to environmental pollution. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管现有研究已经高度关注了政府政策工具对环境治理的影响,但是他们未能探索主要政府工具对环境绩效的关系和不同影响。在本研究中,我们使用了2004-2015年中国31个省的面板数据来调查绩效评估和公众参与对环境绩效的影响。使用四种污染物排放的统计数据来衡量环境绩效。我们从中国环境保护部和省环境保护局收集了绩效评估数据,并使用请愿书和环境非政府组织的官方统计年鉴数据来衡量公众参与程度。我们凭经验确认,绩效评估仅与约束高可见性环境污染物排放(例如二氧化硫)显着相关,而对低可见性约束环境污染物排放(例如化学需氧量)的影响较小。公众参与对环境绩效有不同的影响。环境请愿书与非约束性环境污染物(例如工业废水)显着相关。但是,环境非政府组织对环境污染物的排放没有统计上的显着影响。与“十一五”规划相比,“十二五”规划的环境绩效评价更为有效。该分析表明,中国应优化绩效评估和公众参与的政府方法,以有效应对环境污染。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号