...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste: Energy efficiency, environmental impact and economic feasibility analysis
【24h】

Mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste: Energy efficiency, environmental impact and economic feasibility analysis

机译:机械生物处理市政固体废物:能效,环境影响和经济可行性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Municipal solid waste (MSW) is treated mainly via landfill and incineration in most countries. As the effectiveness of source-point waste classification always cannot be guaranteed especially in developing countries, the introduction of mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) systems is a possible solution, for MBT can separate the biodegradable fraction and recover recyclables from mixed waste streams. Using life cycle assessment, scenario analysis and other methods, the energy, environmental and economic performance of MBT and other mainstream MSW treatment technologies are analyzed and compared. The results showed that raw MSW landfill was the worst management option. Incineration had higher energy efficiency (20.5% energy recovery), but the large amounts of chemicals consumption for fly ash and exhaust treatment were also issues leading to relatively higher life cycle environmental impacts. MBT had the highest energy efficiency when connected with biogas purification systems (38.5% energy recovery), and could significantly avoid pollution than the other two technologies. Moreover, MBT was well-adapted to changing MSW composition, making it a promising supplementary to MSW source separation. However, MBT had weak economic performance and required an economic support policy. Our findings show that product revenue needs to be increased, and infrastructure sharing between MSW treatment facilities should also be encouraged. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在大多数国家,主要通过垃圾掩埋和焚烧来处理城市固体废物(MSW)。由于始终不能保证源头废物分类的有效性,尤其是在发展中国家,因此采用机械生物处理(MBT)系统是一种可能的解决方案,因为MBT可以分离出可生物降解的馏分并从混合废物流中回收可循环利用物。使用生命周期评估,情景分析和其他方法,对MBT和其他主流MSW处理技术的能源,环境和经济绩效进行了分析和比较。结果表明,原始垃圾填埋场是最差的管理选择。焚化具有较高的能源效率(20.5%的能量回收率),但是粉煤灰和废气处理所消耗的大量化学药品也是导致相对较高的生命周期环境影响的问题。与沼气净化系统连接时,MBT的能源效率最高(能量回收率为38.5%),与其他两种技术相比,MBT可以显着避免污染。而且,MBT非常适合改变MSW组成,使其成为MSW源分离的有希望的补充。但是,MBT的经济表现不佳,需要经济支持政策。我们的发现表明,需要增加产品收入,还应鼓励MSW处理设施之间的基础设施共享。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号