首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Environmental impacts of forest biomass-to-energy conversion technologies: Grate furnace vs. fluidised bed furnace
【24h】

Environmental impacts of forest biomass-to-energy conversion technologies: Grate furnace vs. fluidised bed furnace

机译:森林生物质能转化技术对环境的影响:炉排炉与流化床炉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Electricity production from biomass has the potential to significantly contribute to the power mix in Portugal with lesser environmental impact than non-renewable resources. This study focuses on electricity production from the combustion of residual forest biomass from eucalypt logging activities in Portugal using life cycle assessment. In Portugal, several power plants fuelled by residual forest biomass have been commissioned in the last few years. Most of the installations use fluidised bed furnaces, and the others use grate furnaces. This study aims to compare the environmental impacts associated with these two alternative combustion technologies. System boundaries include the stages of forest management, collection processing and transportation and energy conversion. The default impact assessment method used is that suggested in the International Reference Life Cycle Data System. In a sensitivity analysis, calculations are performed using the ReCiPe method. For all of the impact categories analysed, the fluidised bed presents the smallest environmental impact. Even when the grate furnace efficiency increases and the fluidised bed efficiency decreases in the sensitivity analysis, the fluidised bed has lower impacts than the grate technology and can be the best alternative in the implementation of new power plants. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:生物质发电有潜力显着促进葡萄牙的电力结构,其环境影响要小于不可再生资源。这项研究的重点是使用生命周期评估,从葡萄牙桉树伐木活动中燃烧残留森林生物质产生的电力。在葡萄牙,过去几年中已经调试了一些由残留森林生物量作为燃料的发电厂。大多数装置使用流化床炉,其他装置使用炉排炉。这项研究旨在比较与这两种替代燃烧技术相关的环境影响。系统边界包括森林管理,收集加工以及运输和能源转换的阶段。使用的默认影响评估方法是国际参考生命周期数据系统中建议的方法。在灵敏度分析中,使用ReCiPe方法执行计算。对于所有已分析的影响类别,流化床对环境的影响最小。即使在敏感性分析中炉排炉效率提高而流化床效率降低,流化床的影响也比炉排技术低,并且可能是实施新电厂的最佳选择。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2018年第1期|153-162|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Aveiro, Dept Environm & Planning, Ctr Environm & Marine Studies CESAM, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal;

    Univ Aveiro, Dept Environm & Planning, Ctr Environm & Marine Studies CESAM, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal;

    Univ Aveiro, Dept Environm & Planning, Ctr Environm & Marine Studies CESAM, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal;

    Univ Aveiro, Dept Environm & Planning, Ctr Environm & Marine Studies CESAM, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal;

    Univ Aveiro, Dept Environm & Planning, Ctr Environm & Marine Studies CESAM, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Bioenergy policies; Residual forest biomass; Combustion; Fluidised bed; Grate;

    机译:生物能源政策;森林剩余生物量;燃烧;流化床;炉排;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号