首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Evaluation of future food waste management alternatives in Istanbul from the life cycle assessment perspective
【24h】

Evaluation of future food waste management alternatives in Istanbul from the life cycle assessment perspective

机译:从生命周期评估的角度评估伊斯坦布尔未来的食物垃圾管理替代方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In developing countries like Turkey, food waste has the highest share compared to other municipal solid waste components. A detailed life cycle assessment has been performed to evaluate different food waste management options (i.e., landfilling, anaerobic digestion, thermal treatment, co-treatment with municipal wastewater) for Istanbul which is the largest city of Turkey and Europe. The current waste management has the worst environmental performance compared to proposed waste management scenarios as follows: Anaerobic digestion, thermal treatment and co-treatment with municipal wastewater. The thermal treatment scenario has been found to have the best environmental performance in most of the impact categories including climate change. The anaerobic digestion scenario ranks in the first place only in freshwater eutrophication, which is attributed to avoided fertilizer use in this scenario. A drastic improvement with 866% has been found in this category if the anaerobic digestion scenario was followed. Co-treatment with municipal wastewater refers to use of food waste disposers at households and provides improvements especially in marine eutrophication and ecotoxicity. Lower effluent emissions by means of biological wastewater treatment in the co-treatment scenario compared to other proposed scenarios lead to better performance in these categories. Various sub-scenarios have also been investigated such as using biogas as vehicle fuel, replacing a combined heat and power with a condensing plant and increasing food waste addition to sewer lines. Important improvements are not achievable in the first two sub-scenarios; however, increasing food waste addition to sewer lines reduces various environmental impact categories by -41% and -60%. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:与其他城市固体废物成分相比,在像土耳其这样的发展中国家,食物垃圾所占比例最高。已针对土耳其和欧洲最大的城市伊斯坦布尔进行了详细的生命周期评估,以评估不同的食物垃圾管理方案(即垃圾填埋,厌氧消化,热处理,与城市废水的共处理)。与建议的废物管理方案相比,当前的废物管理在环境方面的表现最差,如下所示:厌氧消化,热处理以及与城市废水的共处理。在包括气候变化在内的大多数影响类别中,发现热处理方案具有最佳的环境性能。仅在淡水富营养化中,厌氧消化方案排在第一位,这是由于在这种方案中避免了肥料的使用。如果遵循厌氧消化方案,则在该类别中可发现866%的显着改善。与城市废水的共同处理是指在家庭中使用食物垃圾处理器,并提供了改善,特别是在海洋富营养化和生态毒性方面。与其他拟议方案相比,在协同处置方案中通过生物废水处理降低的废水排放导致这些类别的性能更好。还研究了各种子场景,例如使用沼气作为车辆燃料,用冷凝设备代替热电联产,以及增加下水道的食物垃圾。前两个子场景中无法实现重要的改进。但是,增加下水道中食物垃圾的添加量会使各种环境影响类别减少-41%和-60%。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号