首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Identifying critical risks in Sponge City PPP projects using DEMATEL method: A case study of China
【24h】

Identifying critical risks in Sponge City PPP projects using DEMATEL method: A case study of China

机译:用DEMATEL方法识别海绵城市PPP项目的关键风险:以中国为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sponge City (SC) projects offer an effective measure for coping with frequent occurrence of urban flooding as well as water shortage. In China, enormous demand for urban regeneration and short of capital has precipitated the growth of public-private capitalhip (PPP) mode for achieving urban sustainability. Generally, risk identification is perceived as a crucial step as to ensure the success of PPP mode. However, little attention has been paid to identify critical risks in Sponge City PPP projects for emerging countries, for example China. This paper aims to investigate the critical risk factors of Sponge City PPP projects in the context of China. The list of risk factors used for analysis are gathered from literature review, research group brainstorming, and expert interview. Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method is employed in the study to prioritize the risks and then analyze interdependence between them as to recognize critical risks. The research results show that inadequate supervision system (C-1), government intervention (C-2), immature law and regulations (C-5), project fragmentation (C-13), and unclear boundary of catchment area (C-14) are the critical risk factors. The findings in this study can provide helpful references not only for the local government to adopt management measures for promoting sustainable SC projects, but also for private capital to effectively mitigate risks in future SC projects. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:海绵城市(SC)项目为应对频繁发生的城市洪水和水资源短缺提供了有效的措施。在中国,对城市更新的巨大需求和资金短缺推动了实现城市可持续性的公私资本模式的发展。通常,风险识别被视为确保PPP模式成功的关键步骤。但是,很少有人关注确定新兴市场(例如中国)的海绵城市PPP项目中的重大风险。本文旨在研究中国背景下海绵城市PPP项目的关键风险因素。用于分析的风险因素列表是从文献综述,研究小组集思广益和专家访谈中收集的。本研究采用决策试验和评估实验室(DEMATEL)方法对风险进行优先级排序,然后分析它们之间的相互依赖性以识别关键风险。研究结果表明,监管体系不完善(C-1),政府干预(C-2),法律法规不完善(C-5),项目分散(C-13)以及集水区边界不清晰(C-14) )是关键的危险因素。这项研究的发现不仅可以为地方政府采取管理措施促进可持续的可持续发展项目提供参考,也可以为私人资本有效减轻未来可持续发展项目的风险提供参考。 (C)2019由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号