...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Evaluation of social life-cycle performance of buildings: Theoretical framework and impact assessment approach
【24h】

Evaluation of social life-cycle performance of buildings: Theoretical framework and impact assessment approach

机译:建筑物的社会生命周期绩效评估:理论框架和影响评估方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recognizing the importance of building-specific social impact assessment tools to the achievement of social sustainability of building projects, this study developed a methodological framework for social life cycle assessment of buildings through stakeholder-based approach, which includes the following four parts. (1) An assessment framework was proposed considering four stakeholders, including worker, occupant, local community and society, and impact subcategories associated with different social concerns; (2) Indicators were selected for each subcategory based on the assessment objective and data availability. They were categorized into three groups, including quantitative indicators in generic analysis, as well as quantitative and semi-quantitative indicators in site-specific analysis, and corresponding scoring method were provided; (3) Weights among impact subcategories were generated through questionnaire survey based on analytic hierarchy process method, and weights among life-cycle phases were determined considering the possibility to place control as well as level of concern of construction practitioners; (4) The proposed method was applied to a case study comparing two buildings with different construction methods, namely prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction (PPVC) project and semi-prefabrication project. The result suggests that PPVC project outperforms semi-prefabrication one in terms of life-cycle social performance. This is mainly caused by its capability to protect worker's health and safety as well as its contribution to technology development. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:认识到特定于建筑物的社会影响评估工具对于实现建筑项目的社会可持续性的重要性,本研究开发了一种通过基于利益相关者的方法对建筑进行社会生命周期评估的方法框架,包括以下四个部分。 (1)提出了一个评估框架,其中考虑了四个利益相关者,包括工人,居住者,当地社区和社会,以及与不同社会问题相关的影响子类别; (2)根据评估目标和数据可用性为每个子类别选择了指标。将它们分为三类,包括一般分析中的定量指标以及特定地点分析中的定量和半定量指标,并提供了相应的评分方法。 (3)基于层次分析法,通过问卷调查的方法得出影响子类别的权重,并考虑施工人员的控制权和关注程度,确定生命周期各阶段的权重; (4)将该方法应用于案例研究中,比较了两座具有不同建造方法的建筑物,即预制预制容积式建筑(PPVC)项目和半预制项目。结果表明,就生命周期的社会绩效而言,PPVC项目优于半预制项目。这主要是由于其保护工人健康和安全的能力以及对技术发展的贡献。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号