首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chinese political science >A New Model of Multilateral Development Bank: a Comparative Study of Road Projects by the AIIB and ADB
【24h】

A New Model of Multilateral Development Bank: a Comparative Study of Road Projects by the AIIB and ADB

机译:多边开发银行的新模式:亚投行和亚行道路项目的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As one of the hallmarks of China's increasing participation in global economic governance, the establishment of the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has been widely studied by scholars and policy circles worldwide. However, most of the existing studies use narrative methods and lack microscopic or macroscopic evidence. By selecting two highly comparable cases, road projects from the AIIB and the traditional multilateral development bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), we analyze the management structure, procurement, economy, risk, supervision and safeguard policy framework for both cases. We find that the AIIB mostly aligns with international practices in critical principles but has streamlined project procurement, risk and supervision, which reflects its claim of being "lean" and "clean". We argue that compared with the ADB, the AIIB is probably more efficient and economically sustainable, which is an improvement on the traditional multilateral development banks (MDBs). However, whether the streamlined procedures lead to higher risks will be tested in time as the AIIB conducts more independent projects in the future.
机译:作为中国日益参与全球经济治理的标志之一,亚洲基础设施投资银行(AIIB)的成立已被全球学者和政策界广泛研究。但是,大多数现有研究使用叙述方法,并且缺乏微观或宏观的证据。通过选择两个具有高度可比性的案例,即来自亚投行和传统的多边开发银行,亚洲开发银行(ADB)的公路项目,我们分析了这两种案例的管理结构,采购,经济,风险,监督和保障政策框架。我们发现,亚投行在关键原则上大多与国际惯例保持一致,但是简化了项目的采购,风险和监督,这反映了它的“精益”和“清洁”的主张。我们认为,与亚行相比,亚投行的效率可能更高,经济上也更可持续,这是对传统多边开发银行的一种改进。但是,随着AIIB未来开展更多独立项目,将及时检验简化程序是否会导致更高的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号