首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chinese political science >Daniel A. Bell, The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy
【24h】

Daniel A. Bell, The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy

机译:丹尼尔·贝尔(Daniel A. Bell),《中国模式:政治功臣主义与民主的极限》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Daniel A. Bell's book, entitled The China Model, is an interesting book with a number of encouraging lines of inquiry. However, it promises more than it delivers, and Bell appears to consistently use 'meritocracy' as a euphemism for authoritarianism. Although I was open to being convinced, as I navigated through the book's easy and accessible prose, I found it extremely difficult to accept that, political meritocracy (effectively guardianship) as it is practiced in Singapore and China, is superior to liberal electoral democracy in the long run. Bell simply does not provide enough substantive evidence to support this claim, and the book comes dangerously close to resembling an insidious justification for perpetual single-party rule in regimes that might be better served by embracing fundamental liberal principles like transparency, equality, diversity, empowerment, and cooperation.
机译:丹尼尔·A·贝尔(Daniel A. Bell)的书名为《中国模式》,是一本有趣的书,有许多令人鼓舞的探究内容。但是,它的承诺远非其所能提供,贝尔似乎始终使用“功权主义”作为威权主义的委婉说法。尽管我很容易被说服,但当我浏览本书的简单易懂的散文时,我发现很难接受,在新加坡和中国实行的政治精英制(实际上是监护制)要优于自由民主制。从长远来看。贝尔根本没有提供足够的实质性证据来支持这一主张,而这本书危险地接近于一种永久性单党统治的阴险论据,而在这些政权中,最好通过拥抱透明,平等,多元化,授权等基本自由主义原则来更好地加以服务。和合作。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Chinese political science》 |2016年第3期|397-399|共3页
  • 作者

    Jason R. Lacharite;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Political Science, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:38:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号