首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Central South University of Technology >Buckling analysis of super-long rock-socketed filling piles in soft soil area by element free Galerkin method
【24h】

Buckling analysis of super-long rock-socketed filling piles in soft soil area by element free Galerkin method

机译:无网格Galerkin法分析软土地基超长嵌岩灌注桩的屈曲。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In order to discuss the buckling stability of super-long rock-socketed filling piles widely used in bridge engineering in soft soil area such as Dongting Lake, the second stability type was adopted instead of traditional first type, and a newly invented numerical analysis method, i.e. the element-free Galerkin method (EFGM), was introduced to consider the non-concordant deformation and nonlinearity of the pile-soil interface. Then, based on the nonlinear elastic-ideal plastic pile-soil interface model, a nonlinear iterative algorithm was given to analyze the pile-soil interaction, and a program for buckling analysis of piles by the EFGM (PBAP-EFGM) and arc length method was worked out as well. The application results in an engineering example show that, the shape of pile top load—settlement curve obtained by the program agrees well with the measured one, of which the difference may be caused mainly by those uncertain factors such as possible initial defects of pile shaft and the eccentric loading during the test process. However, the calculated critical load is very close with the measured ultimate load of the test pile, and the corresponding relative error is only 5.6%, far better than the calculated values by linear and nonlinear incremental buckling analysis (with a greater relative error of 37.0% and 15.4% respectively), which also verifies the rationality and feasibility of the present method.
机译:为了讨论洞庭湖等软土地区桥梁工程中广泛使用的超长嵌岩桩的屈曲稳定性,采用第二种稳定类型代替传统的第一种,并采用了新发明的数值分析方法,引入无单元伽勒金方法(EFGM)来考虑桩土界面的非协调变形和非线性。然后,基于非线性弹性理想塑性桩-土界面模型,提出了一种非线性迭代算法来分析桩-土相互作用,并建立了基于EFGM(PBAP-EFGM)和弧长法的桩屈曲分析程序。也被解决了。工程实例的应用结果表明,该程序获得的桩顶荷载-沉降曲线形状与实测曲线吻合得很好,其差异可能主要是由桩身可能存在的初始缺陷等不确定因素引起的。以及测试过程中的偏心载荷。但是,计算的临界载荷与测得的试验桩的极限载荷非常接近,相应的相对误差仅为5.6%,远优于线性和非线性增量屈曲分析的计算值(相对误差为37.0) %和15.4%),这也验证了本方法的合理性和可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号