首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Cross-cultural study of channel relationship factors - Antecedents of satisfaction in a retail setting: A commentary essay
【24h】

Cross-cultural study of channel relationship factors - Antecedents of satisfaction in a retail setting: A commentary essay

机译:渠道关系因素的跨文化研究-零售环境中的满意度前因:评论文章

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Channel relationships within and across diverse markets have been investigated for quite some time. Yet findings from these studies over the last forty years or so have been far from conclusive. Channel researchers Runyan, Sternquist, and Chung (forthcoming) investigate interrelationships between the behavioral constructs of role performance, dependence, conflict, satisfaction, and influence strategy in the U.S. and Japanese context. Reading this paper leads credence to the adage, "The more things change, the more they stay the same." Indeed, a review of representative comparative channels research literature from the 1980s and post-2000 brings to surface striking similarities in terms of shaky conceptual frameworks, less than robust construct measures, and insufficient caveats in explaining and applying research findings. For channels research to gain relevance in today's globalized marketplace, greater sophistication is necessary in formulating and implementing comparative studies. An overarching framework is necessary to explain, if not incorporate, similarities and differences in channel interactions around the globe.
机译:在不同市场内部和之间的渠道关系已经研究了很长时间。然而,在过去的四十年左右的时间里,这些研究的结果远没有定论。频道研究人员Runyan,Sternquist和Chung(即将发表)研究了在美国和日本背景下,角色表现,依赖性,冲突,满意度和影响力策略的行为构造之间的相互关系。阅读本文可以使格言成语:“变化越多,它们保持不变的越多。”确实,对1980年代和2000年后的代表性比较渠道研究文献的回顾,在不稳定的概念框架,不够稳健的构造方法以及解释和应用研究结果的不足之处方面,浮出水面。为了使渠道研究在当今全球化的市场中具有重要意义,在制定和实施比较研究时必须更加复杂。需要一个总体框架来解释(如果不包括在内)全球渠道互动中的相似之处和不同之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号