首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Compliance versus preference: Understanding salesperson response to contests
【24h】

Compliance versus preference: Understanding salesperson response to contests

机译:合规与偏好:了解销售人员对竞赛的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Firms use sales contests to motivate salespeople; however, knowledge of their impact on salespeople is scarce. Acceptance of the contest, according to goal-setting theory, is essential for a contest to motivate salespeople (Hile-Hart et al., 1989). Yet attitude toward (or preference for) the contest is an important factor in motivating effort (Murphy and Dacin, 1998). In an experiment with financial services salespeople, this study examines the compliance effect (Chowdhury, 1993) and propositions that Murphy and Dacin (1998) suggest. Results support goal-setting theory, but also the importance of salesperson's attitude to the contest. While the study partially confirms Chowdhury's (1993) results regarding the influence of contest difficulty, his suggestion that difficulty leads to goal acceptance was not. Valence for winning does not relate to attitude significantly in the study here, contrary to Murphy and Dacin's (1998) propositions. The article develops an integrative model with implications for research and practice.
机译:公司利用销售竞赛来激励销售人员。但是,他们对销售人员的影响的了解很少。根据目标设定理论,接受比赛对于激励销售人员是至关重要的(Hile-Hart等,1989)。然而,对比赛的态度(或偏好)是激励努力的重要因素(Murphy和Dacin,1998)。在一项针对金融服务销售人员的实验中,本研究考察了合规性影响(Chowdhury,1993年)和Murphy和Dacin(1998年)提出的建议。结果支持目标设定理论,也支持销售人员对比赛的态度的重要性。尽管该研究部分证实了乔杜里(1993)关于比赛难度影响的结果,但他认为难度导致目标接受的建议并没有得到证实。与Murphy和Dacin(1998)的主张相反,在本文的研究中获胜的价与态度无关。本文开发了一个对研究和实践具有启示意义的集成模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号