首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Customer equity and market value: Two methods, same results?
【24h】

Customer equity and market value: Two methods, same results?

机译:客户权益和市场价值:两种方法,结果是否相同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although researchers have developed a variety of methods to model customer equity (CE), producing simple and robust models is a difficult task. Often, researchers have to compromise simplicity in favor of robustness or completeness. This paper empirically investigates two CE-based methods to compute proxies for market value. The models differ substantially in terms of complexity and the type of information they use, but their result is equivalent. Both models use Gupta et al. (2004) CE approach, and use data from the Brazilian Telecom Industry. The results show that CE, under the simpler, static approach, when added to net equity, is a good proxy for market value and reasonably equivalent to Gupta et al.'s (2004) CE under the dynamic approach. While the dynamic approach requires some technical training and substantive customer information that might not be readily available, the static approach is simpler and easier to compute.
机译:尽管研究人员已经开发出多种方法来对客户权益(CE)进行建模,但是要生成简单而强大的模型却是一项艰巨的任务。通常,研究人员必须牺牲简单性,以增强鲁棒性或完整性。本文根据经验研究了两种基于CE的方法来计算市场价值的代理。这些模型在复杂性和它们使用的信息类型方面有很大的不同,但是它们的结果是相同的。两种模型都使用Gupta等。 (2004)CE方法,并使用来自巴西电信行业的数据。结果表明,在简单,静态的方法下,CE被添加到净权益中后,可以很好地替代市场价值,并且与动态方法下的Gupta等人(2004)的CE相当。虽然动态方法需要一些技术培训和大量的客户信息,而这些信息可能尚不可用,但静态方法却更容易计算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号