首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Causal complexities to evaluate the effectiveness of remedial instruction
【24h】

Causal complexities to evaluate the effectiveness of remedial instruction

机译:因果复杂性评估辅导的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study investigates 3 models of remedial instruction, e-learning, blended learning, and traditional instruction, to vocational high school students with low mathematics achievement to analyze whether student achievement improves significantly and how each instruction model facilitates improvement. This study applies partial least squares (PLS) and fuzzy set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to analyze the effectiveness and causal complexities of the 3 models. The results indicate that all 3 models facilitate substantial academic progress, the e-learning model being the most effective. The combinations of 6 negative antecedents cause the learning problems of the students. After the changes of a few of these antecedents through the use of remedial instruction, the students improve their scores. FsQCA provides antecedent combinations to show the causal complexities; hence, provides more accurate explanations than does the PLS.
机译:本研究针对数学成绩较低的职业高中生,研究了辅导教学,电子学习,混合学习和传统教学的3种模型,以分析学生的学习成绩是否显着提高以及每种教学模型如何促进改进。这项研究应用偏最小二乘(PLS)和模糊集/定性比较分析(fsQCA)来分析3种模型的有效性和因果复杂性。结果表明,所有三种模型都促进了实质性的学术进步,其中电子学习模型最为有效。 6个负面条件的组合会引起学生的学习问题。通过运用辅导教学改变了其中一些先例后,学生们提高了自己的分数。 FsQCA提供前因组合以显示因果复杂性;因此,提供了比PLS更准确的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号