...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Consumer responses to hedonic food products: Healthy cake or indulgent cake? Could dialecticism be the answer?
【24h】

Consumer responses to hedonic food products: Healthy cake or indulgent cake? Could dialecticism be the answer?

机译:消费者对享乐食品的反应:健康蛋糕还是放纵蛋糕?辩证法是答案吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Marketing of indulgent food products with healthy claims (e.g., healthy cake) is challenging, and studies explaining consumer responses to such products are limited. This research addresses this limitation by focusing on an unexamined driver of responses to vice food products marketed as more healthy—dialectical thinking. Three experimental studies using samples from online panels show that dialecticism has a positive effect on consumers' evaluations of such products when primed within a predominantly non-dialectical culture, across cultures with different levels of dialecticism, and as an individual difference. In all three studies experienced discomfort mediates this effect. This research contributes to extant literature by (1) identifying the role of dialecticism in mitigating consumers' aversion to vice food products with healthy claims, (2) confirming the effects of dialecticism at both cultural and individual levels, and (3) highlighting the managerial relevance of dialecticism.
机译:具有健康声称的放纵食品(例如健康蛋糕)的营销具有挑战性,解释消费者对此类产品的反应的研究非常有限。这项研究着重解决了这一局限性,侧重于对市场上以更健康的辩证思维销售的副食品做出回应的未经审查的驱动因素。使用在线面板样本进行的三项实验研究表明,辩证法在主要是非方言文化中,在具有不同辩证法水平的文化中以及作为个体差异时,对消费者对此类产品的评价具有积极作用。在所有三项研究中,经历的不适介导了这种效应。这项研究为现存文献做出了贡献,包括(1)确定辩证法在减轻消费者对具有健康主张的副食品的厌恶中的作用;(2)确认辩证法在文化和个人层面上的作用;(3)强调管理学。辩证法的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号