首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Corporate Legal Responsibility: A Levinasian Perspective
【24h】

Corporate Legal Responsibility: A Levinasian Perspective

机译:公司法律责任:列维纳斯主义的视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this article I will look into Corporate Legal Responsibility taking into account Levinas's notion of infinite responsibility, as well as his understanding of ethical language. My account of Levinas's philosophy will show that it challenges - breaking down - deeply entrenched distinctions in the dominant strands of moral philosophy, within which the theory of individual responsibility is embedded, such as between:(l) duty to others on the one hand and supererogation on the other; (2) perfect duty to others on the one hand and imperfect duties to others on the other; (3) insiders and outsiders; kith and kin on the one hand and strangers on the other; Levinas's moral vision is an inclusive one which embraces all of humanity (at least of those present today) irrespective of historical, linguistic, cultural differences and diversities. In other words, each has responsibilities for and duties towards all others. Of course, one might say that there is nothing new about a univer-salising ethics - after all Kantianism, liberalism as well as utilitarianism are well known instances. However, more crucially, all these traditional moral philosophies uphold the theory of individual responsibility, which is rooted in the philosophy of individualism. Such a philosophy can make sense only of the concept of individual moral/legal agency but not corporate agency. Therefore, in this article I will attempt to show that the Levinasian vision is able to help us change our view7 with respect to corporate responsibility.
机译:在本文中,我将考虑列维纳斯的无限责任概念以及他对道德语言的理解,来研究公司法律责任。我对列维纳斯哲学的论述将表明,它挑战-分解-道德哲学的主导领域中根深蒂固的区别,其中嵌入了个人责任理论,例如:(l)一方面对他人负责,另一方面另一方面(2)一方面对他人的完全义务,另一方面对他人的不完全义务; (三)内幕人士和局外人;一方面是基思和亲戚,另一方面是陌生人;列维纳斯的道德观是一种包容性的观,它涵盖了全人类(至少是当今的人类),而与历史,语言,文化差异和多样性无关。换句话说,每个人对所有其他人都有责任和义务。当然,也许有人会说,具有普遍意义的伦理学并没有什么新东西-毕竟,康德主义,自由主义和功利主义都是众所周知的例子。但是,更重要的是,所有这些传统的道德哲学都秉承了根植于个人主义哲学的个人责任理论。这种哲学只能使个人道德/法律代理的概念有意义,而对公司代理的概念则没有意义。因此,在本文中,我将尝试证明列维纳斯的愿景能够帮助我们改变有关企业责任的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号