首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Government Intervention, Perceived Benefit, and Bribery of Firms in Transitional China
【24h】

Government Intervention, Perceived Benefit, and Bribery of Firms in Transitional China

机译:转轨中国的政府干预,感知利益与企业贿赂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article examines whether (1) government intervention causes bribery (or corruption) as rent-seeking theory suggested; (2) a firm's perceived benefit partially mediates the relationship between government intervention and its bribing behavior, as rational choice/behavior theory suggested; and (3) other firms' bribing behavior moderates the relationship between government intervention and a firm's perceived benefit. Our study shows that government intervention causes bribery/corruption indeed, but it exerts its effect on bribery/corruption through the firm's perceived benefit. In other words, a firm's perceived benefit fully mediates the relationship between government intervention and its bribing behavior. We also find that other firms' bribery positively moderates the relationship between government intervention and a given firm's bribery. This study partly proves that firms are rational actors. Potential benefit encourages them to practice bribery. Besides, this research also supports the rent-seeking view of bribery/ corruption, which argues that government intervention is a source of bribery/corruption. However, we have also identified that only those government interventions that will create "rent" can cause bribery/corruption.
机译:本文探讨了(1)如寻租理论所建议的那样,政府干预是否会导致贿赂(或腐败); (2)正如理性选择/行为理论所建议的那样,企业的感知利益部分地调节了政府干预与其贿赂行为之间的关系。 (3)其他公司的贿赂行为缓和了政府干预与公司的预期收益之间的关系。我们的研究表明,政府干预确实造成了贿赂/腐败,但它通过企业的感知利益对贿赂/腐败产生了影响。换句话说,企业的感知利益完全调节了政府干预与其贿赂行为之间的关系。我们还发现,其他公司的贿赂可以积极地缓和政府干预与给定公司的贿赂之间的关系。这项研究部分证明了企业是理性参与者。潜在的利益鼓励他们行贿。此外,这项研究还支持寻求贿赂/腐败的寻租观点,认为政府干预是贿赂/腐败的根源。但是,我们还发现,只有那些会产生“租金”的政府干预措施才能造成贿赂/腐败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号