首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Avoiding the Separation Thesis While Maintaining a Positive/Normative Distinction
【24h】

Avoiding the Separation Thesis While Maintaining a Positive/Normative Distinction

机译:在保持正/规范区别的同时避免分离论点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While many scholars agree that the "separation thesis" (Freeman in Bus Ethics Quart 4(4):409-421, 1994)-that business issues and ethical issues can be neatly compartmentalized-is harmful to business ethics scholarship and practice, they also conclude that eliminating it is either inadvisable because of the usefulness of the positiveormative distinction, or actually impossible. Based on an exploration of the fact/value dichotomy and the pragmatist and virtue theoretic responses to it, we develop an approach to eliminating the separation thesis that integrates "business" with "ethics" while still permitting a positiveormative distinction, which we call "ethics from observation.".
机译:尽管许多学者都认为“分离论点”(Freeman in Bus Ethics Quart 4(4):409-421,1994)(商业问题和道德问题可以被整齐地划分)对商业道德的学术和实践有害,但他们也得出的结论是,由于积极/规范性区分的有用性,不建议予以消除,或者实际上是不可能的。在对事实/价值二分法以及实用主义和美德理论对它的探索的基础上,我们开发了一种消除分离论的方法,该论题将“业务”与“伦理”结合在一起,同时仍然允许正面/规范性的区分,我们称之为“观察的伦理”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号