首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Fences as Controls to Reduce Accountants' Rationalization
【24h】

Fences as Controls to Reduce Accountants' Rationalization

机译:栅栏作为减少会计师合理化的控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Occupational fraud frequently involves the direct or indirect participation of professional accountants (PA). To reduce fraud, companies often focus on the incentive/pressure and opportunity legs of the fraud triangle, perhaps believing that rationalization is beyond their control. We argue that rationalization reduction is necessary to minimize occupational fraud. We propose that educators and PA consider incorporating fences as controls to reduce rationalization. Because they focus on compliance and risk avoidance and are non-negotiable, fences appeal to accountant's Myers Briggs personalities and conventional level of moral development. Educators can teach students about the fences used in practice, and explain how they help new professionals resist pressures and temptations. By adding fences to existing professional guidance, accountants can reduce the likelihood that they will be a party to fraud.
机译:职业欺诈经常涉及专业会计师(PA)的直接或间接参与。为了减少欺诈,公司通常将注意力集中在欺诈三角的动机/压力和机会上,也许他们认为合理化超出了他们的控制范围。我们认为合理化减少对于最大限度地减少职业欺诈是必要的。我们建议教育工作者和巴勒斯坦权力机构考虑将围栏作为控制措施以减少合理化。由于它们专注于合规性和风险规避并且是不可谈判的,因此栅栏吸引了会计师的迈尔斯·布里格斯个性和道德发展的常规水平。教育者可以教给学生有关实践中使用的围栏的信息,并说明他们如何帮助新专业人员抵御压力和诱惑。通过在现有的专业指导中添加围栏,会计师可以降低其成为欺诈方的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号