首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics: The Enron Effect-Love of Money, Corporate Ethical Values, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), and Dishonesty Across 31 Geopolitical Entities
【24h】

Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics: The Enron Effect-Love of Money, Corporate Ethical Values, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), and Dishonesty Across 31 Geopolitical Entities

机译:货币情报和行为经济学:安然效应-金钱,公司道德价值,腐败感知指数(CPI)和对31个地缘政治实体的不诚实

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Monetary intelligence theory asserts that individuals apply their money attitude to frame critical concerns in the context and strategically select certain options to achieve financial goals and ultimate happiness. This study explores the dark side of monetary Intelligence and behavioral economics-dishonesty (corruption). Dishonesty, a risky prospect, involves cost-benefit analysis of self-interest. We frame good or bad barrels in the environmental context as a proxy of high or low probability of getting caught for dishonesty, respectively. We theorize: The magnitude and intensity of the relationship between love of money and dishonest prospect (dishonesty) may reveal how individuals frame dishonesty in the context of two levels of subjective norm-perceived corporate ethical values at the micro-level (CEV, Level 1) and Corruption Perceptions Index at the macro-level (CPI, Level 2), collected from multiple sources. Based on 6382 managers in 31 geopolitical entities across six continents, our cross-level three-way interaction effect illustrates: As expected, managers in good barrels (high CEV/high CPI), mixed barrels (low CEV/high CPI or high CEV/low CPI), and bad barrels (low CEV/low CPI) display low, medium, and high magnitude of dishonesty, respectively. With high CEV, the intensity is the same across cultures. With low CEV, the intensity of dishonesty is the highest in high CPI entities (risk seeking of high probability)-the Enron Effect, but the lowest in low CPI entities (risk aversion of low probability). CPI has a strong impact on the magnitude of dishonesty, whereas CEV has a strong impact on the intensity of dishonesty. We demonstrate dishonesty in light of monetary values and two frames of social norm, revealing critical implications to the field of behavioral economics and business ethics.
机译:货币情报理论断言,个人运用他们的金钱态度来构架上下文中的关键问题,并从战略上选择某些选项以实现财务目标和最终的幸福。这项研究探索了货币智力和行为经济学-不诚实(腐败)的阴暗面。不诚实是一种冒险的前景,涉及对自身利益的成本效益分析。在环境环境中,我们将好坏的桶分别作为不诚实的高概率或低概率的代表。我们推论:金钱的爱与不诚实的前景(不诚实)之间的关系的强度和强度可能揭示个人如何在微观水平上从两个级别的主观标准感知的公司道德价值观中构架不诚实(CEV,级别1) )和从多个来源收集的宏观水平(CPI,水平2)的腐败感知指数。基于遍布六大洲31个地缘政治实体的6382名管理人员,我们的跨层次三级交互作用说明:预期中,管理人员处于良好桶中(高CEV /高CPI),混合桶中(低CEV /高CPI或高CEV /低CPI)和坏桶(低CEV /低CPI)分别显示低,中和高不诚实程度。在高CEV的情况下,跨文化的强度是相同的。在低CEV的情况下,不诚实的程度在高CPI实体中(寻求高风险的风险)最高(安然效应),而在低CPI实体中则最低(欺诈风险的低概率)。 CPI对不诚实程度的影响很大,而CEV对不诚实程度的影响很大。我们根据货币价值和两个社会规范框架来证明不诚实,揭示了对行为经济学和商业道德领域的关键意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号