...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing >Purchasing Higher-Value, Higher-Price Offerings in Business Markets
【24h】

Purchasing Higher-Value, Higher-Price Offerings in Business Markets

机译:在商业市场中购买更高价值,更高价格的产品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: A conceptual framework is proposed and tested to better understand customers' purchase of higher-value, higher-price offerings in business markets. Ambiguity about superior value and consequences of obtaining superior value are the constructs in this framework. Ambiguity about superior value is meant to capture the concern and doubt that managers at customer firms have about whether their business will actually realize the cost savings or ability to earn incremental revenue and profits that suppliers claim for their offerings. Consequences of obtaining superior value refers to the outcomes that a customer manager anticipates or experiences in making a purchase decision for higher-value, higher-price offerings.Methodology: Two operationalizations of each construct are studied in a pair of experiments with purchasing managers and plant maintenance managers.Findings: Value evidence and incentive to change each receive significant support as mechanisms to reduce ambiguity about superior value. Notably, reference customers and pilot programs appear to be equally effective as value evidence in reducing ambiguity about superior value. In addition, the results provide strong empirical support that incentive to change operates as a threshold phenomenon, as predicted from social judgment theory. While no significant differences in purchase preferences are found for area of responsibility (purchasing versus plant maintenance managers), significant support is found for performance review and reward system as a manipulation of consequences of obtaining superior value.Contribution: The conceptual framework and empirical results significantly contribute to our understanding of how suppliers in business markets can use monetary as well as nonmonetary means to persuade customers to purchase higher-value, yet higher-price offerings.View full textDownload full textKEYWORDSbusiness marketing, purchasing, value-based pricing, value ambiguityRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10517120903000363
机译:目的:提出并测试了一个概念框架,以更好地了解客户在商业市场中购买的高价值,高价格产品。在这个框架中,关于优越价值的歧义和获得优越价值的后果。关于高价值的模棱两可旨在引起客户公司经理对他们的业务是否会真正实现成本节省或能够获得供应商为其产品声称的增量收入和利润的能力的担忧和怀疑。获得卓越价值的后果是指客户经理预期的结果或为更高价值,更高价格的产品做出购买决策时所经历的方法。方法:在与采购经理和工厂进行的一对实验中研究了每种构造的两种操作维护经理。发现:有价值的证据和改变的动机都得到了重要的支持,这是减少对优质价值的模棱两可的机制。值得注意的是,参考客户和试点计划似乎在减少价值优劣方面的价值证据方面同样有效。此外,结果提供了有力的经验支持,如社会判断理论所预测的那样,变革的激励作用是一种阈值现象。虽然没有发现责任领域(采购与工厂维护经理)的购买偏好有显着差异,但为绩效评估和奖励制度提供了重大支持,这是对操纵获得卓越价值的后果的操纵。贡献:概念框架和实证结果显着有助于我们了解商业市场中的供应商如何使用货币和非货币手段来说服客户购买价值更高,价格更高的产品。全文下载关键词商业营销,采购,基于价值的定价,价值歧义相关变量addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10517120903000363

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号