首页> 外文期刊>Journal of business & industrial marketing >Pure or ambidextrous strategy? A study of responsive and proactive market orientations in industrial firms
【24h】

Pure or ambidextrous strategy? A study of responsive and proactive market orientations in industrial firms

机译:纯粹或二手怀托的策略?工业公司敏感与主动市场取向研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate the environmental conditions (i.e. competitive intensity) under which a pure strategy or an ambidextrous strategy of implementing responsive market orientations (RMOs) and/or proactive market orientations (PMOs) is more advantageous for firm's performance.Design/methodology/approachDrawing upon the market orientation (MO) and strategy literatures, the authors test the study's model empirically using a sample of 308 US-based firms operating in industrial markets. All measurement items are taken from the widely used maturity scale which has been confirmed in the literature.FindingsThe empirical results suggest that when the competitive intensity is high, pursuing a purity strategy of RMO while decreasing PMO is the best course of action. On the other hand, balancing between RMO and PMO (implementing a strategy of ambidexterity) can increase firm's performance in a low competitive intensity environment.Research limitations/implicationsThis study aims to contribute to the existing MO literature in several ways: first, this study advances the MO literature by emphasizing the moderating role of competitive intensity on the effects of different MO strategies (purity or ambidextrous MO strategy); second, this study focuses on the firms operating in industrial markets and informs managers on how to adopt RMO and PMO under different level of competitive intensity; third, this study is the extended research of the prior study published in this journal (Wang et al., 2013), which examined the environmental antecedents of adopting RMO and PMO.Practical implicationsFirst, firms operating in industrial markets should increase RMO, while at the same time decrease PMO, in a highly competitive intensity environment. Second, companies should pursue both RMO and PMO at the same time in a low competitive intensity environment. Balancing between RMO and PMO can improve firms' performance in a low competitive intensity environment.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the industrial business and marketing literature by sharpening the theoretical understanding of the impact of RMOs and PMOs on firm's performance. It also offers practical insights to managers of industrial firms on when to adopt RMOs and/or PMOs under different levels of competitive intensity.
机译:本研究的目的的目的是研究环境条件(即竞争强度),其中纯粹的策略或实施敏感市场取向(RMOS)和/或主动市场取向(PMOS)对公司的表现更有利.Design /方法/接近市场定位(MO)和战略文献,作者使用在工业市场运营的308家美国公司的样本来测试研究的模型。所有测量项目都取自广泛使用的成熟度规模,这些项目已经在文献中得到了证实。凭经验结果表明,当竞争强度高时,追求RMO的纯度策略,同时降低PMO是最好的行动方案。另一方面,RMO和PMO之间的平衡(实施了策略)可以在低竞争力环境中增加公司的性能。研究限制/含义旨在以多种方式促进现有的MO文学:首先,这项研究进展通过强调竞争强度对不同MO策略的影响的调节作用(纯度或二手摩尔策略)来说,莫文献;其次,本研究重点介绍了在工业市场运营的公司,并通知管理人员如何在不同水平的竞争强度下采用RMO和PMO;第三,本研究是本杂志上发布的前几项研究的扩展研究(Wang等,2013),该研究审查了采用RMO和PMO的环境前书。实践含义,在工业市场运营的公司应该增加RMO,而在同时减少PMO,在竞争力的强度环境中。其次,公司应在低竞争力环境中同时追求RMO和PMO。 RMO和PMO之间的平衡可以通过低竞争力的强度环境来提高公司的表现。通过锐化对RMOS和PMOS对公司性能的影响的理论理解,为工业商业和营销文献提供了贡献。它还为工业公司的管理人员提供了实用的洞察,何时采用不同水平的竞争强度的利润和/或PMOS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号