首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bridge engineering >Bottom Flange Confinement Reinforcement in Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders
【24h】

Bottom Flange Confinement Reinforcement in Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders

机译:预制预应力混凝土桥梁梁的底部法兰约束加固

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The AASHTO standard bridge specifications require that nominal reinforcement should be placed to enclose prestressing steel at girder ends for at least a distance equal to the girder's height. The AASHTO LRFD bridge specifications state that the minimum requirements for this confinement reinforcement is No. 10 (#3) bars at a maximum spacing of 150 mm (6 in.) for at least 1.5 times the girder's height. Neither standard nor LRFD specifications justify the need for such reinforcement. The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of confinement reinforcement on the performance of prestressed concrete bridge girders. Of particular interest is the effect on transfer and development length of prestressing steel and on the shear capacity of prestressed girders. The experimental investigation includes testing the flexural and shear capacities of 610 mm (24 in.) deep T-girders and 1,100 mm (43.3 in.) I-girders. The results indicate that (1) neither the amount or distribution of confinement reinforcement has a significant effect on the transfer length of prestress strands; (2) at the AASHTO calculated development length, the amount of confinement reinforcement does not have significant impact on either the nominal flexural capacity of bridge girders or bond capacity of the prestressing steel, however, the distribution of confinement reinforcement along the entire length of the girder results in improved ductility and reduced cracking under extreme loading conditions; and (3) confinement reinforcement improves the anchorage of strands at girder ends, and consequently, the shear capacity of prestressed girders.
机译:AASHTO标准桥梁规范要求应放置名义钢筋,以在梁端封闭预应力钢,且其距离至少应等于梁的高度。 AASHTO LRFD桥梁规范指出,这种加固钢筋的最低要求是10号钢筋(#3),最大间距为150毫米(6英寸),且其高度至少为梁的高度的1.5倍。标准和LRFD规范都不能证明需要这种加固。这项研究的主要目的是研究限制加固对预应力混凝土桥梁性能的影响。特别令人感兴趣的是对预应力钢的传递和发展长度以及对预应力大梁的抗剪承载力的影响。实验研究包括测试610毫米(24英寸)深T型梁和1,100毫米(43.3英寸)工字梁的抗弯和抗剪能力。结果表明:(1)约束钢筋的数量或分布对预应力股的传递长度均无显着影响; (2)在AASHTO计算的发展长度上,约束钢筋的数量对桥梁大梁的标称抗弯能力或预应力钢的粘结能力均无显着影响,但是,约束钢筋在钢筋混凝土全长上的分布在极端载荷条件下,大梁可提高延展性并减少龟裂; (3)约束加固可以改善钢绞线在梁端的锚固力,从而改善预应力梁的抗剪承载力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of bridge engineering》 |2012年第4期|p.607-616|共10页
  • 作者单位

    E-construct.USA LLC, 11823 Arbor St., Suite 200, Omaha, NE 68144;

    Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1110 S. 67th St., Omaha, NE 68182;

    Con-Fab California Corporation, 1910 E. Lathrop Rd., Lathrop, CA 95330 formerly, Postdoctoral Fellow, Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1110 S. 67th St., Omaha, NE 68182;

    Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1110 S. 67th St., Omaha, NE 68182-0178 and Principal, e-construct.USA, Omaha, NE;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    prestressed concrete; confinement reinforcement; precast girders; full-scale tests; concrete bridges;

    机译:预应力混凝土;禁闭加固;预制大梁;全面测试;混凝土桥梁;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号