首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry >Futility Determination as a Process: Problems with Medical Sovereignty, Legal Issues and the Strengths and Weakness of the Procedural Approach
【24h】

Futility Determination as a Process: Problems with Medical Sovereignty, Legal Issues and the Strengths and Weakness of the Procedural Approach

机译:无效决定作为一个过程:医疗主权问题,法律问题以及程序方法的优缺点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Futility is not a purely medical concept. Its subjective nature requires a balanced procedural approach where competing views can be aired and in which disputes can be resolved with procedural fairness. Law should play an important role in this process. Pure medical models of futility are based on a false claim of medical sovereignty. Procedural approaches avoid the problems of such claims. This paper examines the arguments for and against the adoption of a procedural approach to futility determination.
机译:无用不是纯粹的医学概念。它的主观性要求采取一种平衡的程序性方法,在这种程序性方法中,可以发表相互竞争的观点,并且可以以程序公正性解决争端。法律应在这一过程中发挥重要作用。毫无用处的纯医学模型是基于对医学主权的错误主张。程序性方法避免了此类索赔的问题。本文探讨了赞成和反对采用程序性方法来确定无效性的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号