...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Behavioral Medicine >Reliability and Construct Validity of the Pain Distress Inventory
【24h】

Reliability and Construct Validity of the Pain Distress Inventory

机译:疼痛困扰量表的信度和建构效度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We conducted three studies to evaluate further the reliability and construct validity of a new self-report instrument, the Pain Distress Inventory (PDI; Osman et al., 2003, The Pain Distress Inventory: Development and initial psychometric properties, J. Clin. Psychol. 59: 767–785). In Study I, exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic results confirmed the replicability of the four-factor oblique solution of the PDI in a mixed sample of students and nonstudents. We also found strong evidence for criterion-related validity of scores on this instrument. In Study II, multisample analyses results found further evidence for equivalence of structure of the PDI across African American and Caucasian young adults. Ethnic and gender group differences were obtained on two of the PDI scale scores. Internal consistency reliability estimates on the PDI total and scale scores were good in both Studies I and II. In Study III, additional analyses of internal consistency and known-groups validity established strong support for construct validity of the PDI.
机译:我们进行了三项研究,以进一步评估一种新的自我报告工具“疼痛困扰量表”(PDI; Osman等人,2003年,“疼痛困扰量表:发展和初始心理计量学特性”,J。Clin。Psychol 59:767-785)。在研究I中,探索性和确认性因素分析结果证实了PDI斜向四因子溶液在学生和非学生混合样本中的可复制性。我们还找到了有力的证据证明该工具的评分与标准相关。在研究II中,多样本分析结果发现了跨非裔美国人和白种人年轻人的PDI结构等效的进一步证据。在两个PDI量表评分中获得了种族和性别差异。在研究I和II中,对PDI总分和量表得分的内部一致性可靠性估计均不错。在研究III中,对内部一致性和已知群体有效性的其他分析为PDI的结构有效性提供了有力的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号