...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Behavioral Decision Making >Eye Movements in Strategic Choice
【24h】

Eye Movements in Strategic Choice

机译:战略选择中的眼球运动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In risky and other multiattribute choices, the process of choosing is well described by random walk or drift diffusion models in which evidence is accumulated over time to threshold. In strategic choices, level-k and cognitive hierarchy models have been offered as accounts of the choice process, in which people simulate the choice processes of their opponents or partners. We recorded the eye movements in 2x2 symmetric games including dominance-solvable games like prisoner's dilemma and asymmetric coordination games like stag hunt and hawk-dove. The evidence was most consistent with the accumulation of payoff differences over time: we found longer duration choices with more fixations when payoffs differences were more finely balanced, an emerging bias to gaze more at the payoffs for the action ultimately chosen, and that a simple count of transitions between payoffswhether or not the comparison is strategically informativewas strongly associated with the final choice. The accumulator models do account for these strategic choice process measures, but the level-k and cognitive hierarchy models do not. (c) 2015 The Authors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
机译:在有风险的和其他多属性选择中,选择过程可以通过随机游动或漂移扩散模型很好地描述,在该模型中,随着时间的推移会积累证据直至达到阈值。在战略选择中,已经提供了k级和认知层次模型作为选择过程的说明,人们在此模型中模拟对手或伴侣的选择过程。我们在2x2对称游戏中记录了眼球运动,包括囚徒困境等可解决优势的游戏以及雄鹿狩猎和鹰鸽等不对称协调游戏。证据与随着时间的推移累积的收益差异最一致:当收益差异更精细地平衡时,我们发现了更长的持续时间选择和更多的注视,出现了一种最终偏向于更多地注视最终选择的行动的收益,并且这种简单的计数比较结果是否具有战略意义的回报与最终选择之间的关系密切。累加器模型确实考虑了这些战略选择过程的措施,但k级模型和认知层次模型却没有。 (c)2015作者。约翰·威利父子有限公司出版的《行为决策杂志》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号