首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Behavioral Decision Making >Giving, Fast and Slow: Reflection Increases Costly (but Not Uncostly) Charitable Giving
【24h】

Giving, Fast and Slow: Reflection Increases Costly (but Not Uncostly) Charitable Giving

机译:奉献,快速和缓慢:反思增加了昂贵(但并非不昂贵)的慈善奉献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Are people intuitively generous or stingy? Does reflection make people more willing to give generous amounts to charity? Findings across the literature are mixed, with many studies finding no clear relationship between reflection and charitable giving (e.g., Hauge, Brekke, Johansson, Johansson-Stenman, & Svedsater, ; Tinghog et al., ), while others find that reflection negatively affects giving (e.g., Small, Loewenstein, & Slovic, ), and still others find that reflection is positively associated with giving (e.g., Lohse, Goeschl, & Diederich, ). I demonstrate that reflection consistently increases costly giving to charity. In Study 1, people were initially reluctant to give costly amounts of money to charity, but those who reflected about the decision were more willing to give. In Studies 2-3, I isolated the role of costly stakes by randomly assigning people to either an uncostly donation ($0.40) or costly donation condition (e.g., $100), and randomly assigning them to decide under time pressure or after reflecting. Reflection increased their willingness to give costly amounts, but did not influence their willingness to give uncostly amounts. Similarly, the relationship between decision time and giving was positive when the stakes were costly but was relatively flat when the stakes were uncostly (Study 4). Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:人们是直觉上大方还是小气?反思是否会使人们更愿意慷慨解囊?文献中的发现参差不齐,许多研究发现反射与慈善捐赠之间没有明确的关系(例如,豪格(Hauge),布雷克(Brekke),约翰森(Johansson),约翰森-斯滕曼(Johansson-Stenman)和斯维德萨特(Svedsater);廷霍格(Tinghog)等。给予(例如Small,Loewenstein和Slovic,),还有其他人发现反射与给予正相关(例如,Lohse,Goeschl和Diederich,)。我证明了反思不断增加了对慈善事业的付出。在研究1中,人们最初不愿将昂贵的金钱捐赠给慈善机构,但是那些对这一决定有所了解的人则更愿意捐赠。在研究2-3中,我通过将人们随机分配到无成本的捐赠(0.40美元)或成本高的捐赠条件(例如100美元)中,并随机分配他们在时间压力下或反思后做出决定,来隔离成本高昂的股份的作用。反思增加了他们付出高额费用的意愿,但并没有影响他们付出无代价的金额的意愿。同样,当赌注成本高昂时,决策时间与奉献之间的关系是正的,而当赌注成本高昂时,决策时间与捐赠之间的关系就相对平坦(研究4)。版权所有(c)2017 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号