...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Idiosyncratic risk does not matter: A re-examination of the relationship between average returns and average volatilities
【24h】

Idiosyncratic risk does not matter: A re-examination of the relationship between average returns and average volatilities

机译:特质风险无关紧要:重新检查平均收益率和平均波动率之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A recent study by Goyal and Santa-Clara [J. Finance 58 (2003) 975] finds a significantly positive relationship between average stock returns and pre-determined average return volatility measures, while finding no relationship between the average return and its own volatility. The result is interpreted as evidence that idiosyncratic risk matters in asset pricing. We re-examine the issue in extended sample periods and find the proclaimed positive relationship is not substantiated. Our analysis indicates that the above-mentioned positive relationship is mainly driven by the data in the 1990s. The trading strategy suggested by Goyal and Santa-Clara to exploit the return predictability by pre-determined volatility does not yield sustained economic gains.
机译:Goyal和Santa-Clara的最新研究[J. Finance 58(2003)975]发现平均股票收益率和预定的平均收益率波动率度量之间存在显着的正相关关系,而发现平均收益率与其自身波动率之间没有关系。结果被解释为证据,表明特质风险对资产定价至关重要。我们在延长的采样期内重新检查了该问题,发现所宣称的正向关系没有得到证实。我们的分析表明,上述正相关关系主要是由1990年代的数据驱动的。 Goyal和Santa-Clara建议的通过预定波动率来利用收益可预测性的交易策略不会带来持续的经济收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号