...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >The effects of bank and nonbank provider locations on household use of financial transaction services
【24h】

The effects of bank and nonbank provider locations on household use of financial transaction services

机译:银行和非银行提供者所在地对家庭使用金融交易服务的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examine the influence that geographic proximity to bank branches and nonbank financial providers has on use of financial transaction services among U.S. households. We specify a bivariate probit model of bank account ownership and nonbank transaction product use to reflect the joint nature of these choices, and estimate the model on a large, nationally representative dataset. Our results indicate that households with reasonable geographic access to bank branches are more likely to have a bank account and less likely to use nonbank transaction products. The influence of bank and nonbank provider locations is fairly modest overall, although effects are bigger for households that are more likely to be on the margin of bank account ownership. Even among such households, however, the effects of bank and nonbank provider locations on financial transaction services use are not as large as those associated with key household-level attributes, such as income, education, or race. Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:我们研究了地理位置接近银行分支机构和非银行金融提供者对美国家庭使用金融交易服务的影响。我们指定了银行帐户所有权和非银行交易产品使用的双变量概率模型来反映这些选择的共同性质,并在具有全国代表性的大型数据集上对该模型进行估算。我们的结果表明,拥有合理地理位置的银行分支机构的家庭更有可能拥有银行帐户,而不太可能使用非银行交易产品。银行和非银行提供者所在地的影响总体而言是相当适度的,尽管对更有可能依靠银行账户所有权的家庭而言,影响更大。但是,即使在这样的家庭中,银行和非银行提供者所在地对金融交易服务使用的影响也没有与关键的家庭级属性(例如收入,教育或种族)相关的影响大。由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号