首页> 外文期刊>The journal of architecture >The banks of Frankfurt and the sustainable city
【24h】

The banks of Frankfurt and the sustainable city

机译:法兰克福和可持续城市之滨

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this article is to understand better the political content of the now ubiquitous term, sustainable development. Perhaps the most elegant definition of sustainable development yet devised is that by planner Scott Campbell. His definition is illustrated by a simple equilateral triangle in which the competing demands of the three Es - environmental protection, economic development, and social equity - occupy the triangle's corners. The three Es have been conceptually related by a public discourse associated with the environmental movement over the past thirty years. What is novel about Campbell's contribution to this discourse is the triangulated structure of the three variables and his proposal that correspondingly, a series of three rational conflicts occupy the triangle's sides. Campbell's point is that sustainable development lies at the geometric centre of the triangle and can be achieved only by negotiating and thus balancing the dynamic conflicts that naturally exist between the networks of interest nested in each corner. Although Campbell's definition is extremely helpful, we will argue that it does not go quite far enough. Implicit in Campbell's logic is the idea that sustainable development is a discursive mode of conflict resolution. Such an activity, we argue, is inherently democratic because it assumes that citizens in conflict will rationally resolve their disputes in public space. To develop further this hypothesis we rely on the description of Strong Democracy developed by the political philosopher, Benjamin Barber. Barber argues that the history of Western liberal democracy is constituted of three dispositions - anarchism, realism, and minimalism. In this political taxonomy, each liberal disposition distinguishes itself by opting for alternative modes of conflict resolution: anarchists tend to deny the existence of conflict, realists tend to suppress it, and minimalists tend to tolerate it. This distinction will be further developed below.
机译:本文的目的是更好地理解当今无处不在的术语可持续发展的政治内容。计划者斯科特·坎贝尔(Scott Campbell)可能是迄今设计的关于可持续发展的最优雅的定义。用一个简单的等边三角形说明了他的定义,其中三个E的竞争需求(环境保护,经济发展和社会公平)占据了三角形的角落。在过去的三十年中,与环境运动相关的公众话语在概念上将三个E联系在一起。关于坎贝尔对这种话语的贡献的新颖之处在于三个变量的三角结构以及他的建议,即相应地,一系列三个有理冲突占据了三角形的边。坎贝尔的观点是,可持续发展位于三角形的几何中心,只有通过谈判从而平衡嵌套在每个角落的利益网络之间自然存在的动态冲突,才能实现可持续发展。尽管坎贝尔的定义非常有帮助,但我们将认为它的意义还远远不够。坎贝尔逻辑中隐含着这样一种观念,即可持续发展是冲突解决的一种话语方式。我们认为,这种活动本质上是民主的,因为它假定冲突中的公民将在公共场所合理解决其争端。为了进一步发展这个假设,我们依赖于政治哲学家本杰明·巴伯(Benjamin Barber)对强民主的描述。理发师认为,西方自由民主的历史是由三种倾向构成的:无政府主义,现实主义和极简主义。在这种政治分类法中,每个自由派倾向都通过选择替代性的冲突解决方式来区分自己:无政府主义者倾向于否认冲突的存在,现实主义者倾向于压制冲突,极简主义者倾向于容忍冲突。这种区别将在下面进一步发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号