【24h】

SAVING TIME - LOSING GROUND

机译:节省时间-丢失地面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper argues that the relation between technology and nature is a dialectical one. Technology shapes the landscape, and the landscape reacts back. The consequences can be simultaneously beneficial and costly, as well as paradoxical and contradictory. Contemporary society continues the primal motivation to fashion tools in order to make life easier and more certain. Recent years have seen an almost Cambrian explosion of new technology. The genie is out of the bottle and can never be put back, resulting in a profound tension between the social and physical world. Growing populations and economic activity spread impervious surfaces, giving rise to ever more costly flooding, erosion, and pollution. In urban sprawl, people seek to return to natural landscapes; however, as they do, they destroy the very goal they seek. The tension is dynamic - as technology accelerates, so does the volatility of nature's response. The author calls for a renewed emphasis on technology assessment, arguing that new technologies need to be evaluated for their impact on the natural landscape just as with real estate development processes.
机译:本文认为技术与自然之间的关系是辩证的。技术造就了景观,景观也做出了回应。结果可能既有益又昂贵,并且自相矛盾和矛盾。当代社会继续追求时尚工具,以使生活更轻松,更确定。近年来,新技术几乎在寒武纪爆发。精灵已经破灭,永远无法退缩,从而在社会世界和物质世界之间产生了深远的张力。不断增长的人口和经济活动渗透了不透水的表面,导致洪水,侵蚀和污染的代价越来越高。在城市蔓延中,人们寻求回归自然景观。但是,这样做确实破坏了他们追求的目标。张力是动态的-随着技术的发展,自然反应的波动性也在加剧。作者呼吁重新强调技术评估,认为与房地产开发过程一样,需要评估新技术对自然景观的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Richard S. Bolan;

  • 作者单位

    Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:28:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号