...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Physics >Comparison Of The 3ω Method And Time-domain Thermoreflectance For Measurements Of The Cross-plane Thermal Conductivity Of Epitaxial Semiconductors
【24h】

Comparison Of The 3ω Method And Time-domain Thermoreflectance For Measurements Of The Cross-plane Thermal Conductivity Of Epitaxial Semiconductors

机译:外延半导体横向平面热导率测量中3ω方法和时域热反射率的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 3ω technique and time-domain thermoreflectance (TDTR) are two experimental methods capable of measuring the cross-plane thermal conductivity of thin films. We compare the cross-plane thermal conductivity measured by the 3ω method and TDTR on epitaxial (In_(0.52)Al_(0.48))_x(In_(0.53)Ga_(0.47))_(1-x)As alloy layers with embedded ErAs nanoparticles. Thermal conductivities measured by TDTR at low modulation frequencies (~1 MHz) are typically in good agreement with thermal conductivities measured by the 3ω method. We discuss the accuracy and limitations of both methods and provide guidelines for estimating uncertainties for each approach.
机译:3ω技术和时域热反射率(TDTR)是两种能够测量薄膜横断面热导率的实验方法。我们比较了通过3ω法和TDTR测量的外延(In_(0.52)Al_(0.48))_ x(In_(0.53)Ga_(0.47))_(1-x)As合金层的横向平面热导率纳米粒子。 TDTR在低调制频率(约1 MHz)下测得的热导率通常与3ω法测得的热导率非常吻合。我们讨论了这两种方法的准确性和局限性,并提供了估算每种方法不确定性的指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号