首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied econometrics >Differencing versus nondifferencing in factor-based forecasting
【24h】

Differencing versus nondifferencing in factor-based forecasting

机译:基于因子的预测中的差异与非分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper studies performance of factor-based forecasts using differenced and nondifferenced data. Approximate variances of forecasting errors from the two forecasts are derived and compared. It is reported that the forecast using nondifferenced data tends to be more accurate than that using differenced data. This paper conducts simulations to compare root mean squared forecasting errors of the two competing forecasts. Simulation results indicate that forecasting using nondifferenced data performs better. The advantage of using nondifferenced data is more pronounced when a forecasting horizon is long and the number of factors is large. This paper applies the two competing forecasting methods to 68I(1) monthly US macroeconomic variables across a range of forecasting horizons and sampling periods. We also provide detailed forecasting analysis on US inflation and industrial production. We find that forecasts using nondifferenced data tend to outperform those using differenced data.
机译:本文研究了使用差异和非流白的数据的基于因子的预测的表现。派生了两次预测的预测误差的近似差异。据报道,使用非学生数据的预测往往比使用差异数据更准确。本文进行了模拟,以比较两种竞争预测的根均匀预测误差。仿真结果表明,使用内部数据的预测更好地执行。当预测地平线长而且因素数量大时,使用非自动数据的优势更加明显。本文将两种竞争预测方法应用于68I(1)次跨越一系列预测视野和采样期的美国宏观经济变量。我们还提供了对美国通货膨胀和工业生产的详细预测分析。我们发现,使用非学生数据的预测往往倾向于优于使用差异数据的预测。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of applied econometrics》 |2020年第6期|728-750|共23页
  • 作者

    Choi In; Jeong Hanbat;

  • 作者单位

    Sogang Univ Dept Econ Seoul South Korea;

    Ohio State Univ Dept Econ Columbus OH 43210 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号