...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Biomechanics >Single-Task and Dual-Task Gait Among Collegiate Athletes of Different Sport Classifications: Implications for Concussion Management
【24h】

Single-Task and Dual-Task Gait Among Collegiate Athletes of Different Sport Classifications: Implications for Concussion Management

机译:不同运动类别的大学运动员的单项和双项步态:对脑震荡管理的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Gait impairments have been documented following sport-related concussion. Whether preexisting gait pattern differences exist among athletes who participate in different sport classifications, however, remains unclear. Dual-task gait examinations probe the simultaneous performance of everyday tasks (ie, walking and thinking), and can quantify gait performance using inertial sensors. The purpose of this study was to compare the single-task and dual-task gait performance of collision/contact and noncontact athletes. A group of collegiate athletes (n = 265) were tested before their season at 3 institutions (mean age= 19.1 +/- 1.1 years). All participants stood still (single-task standing) and walked while simultaneously completing a cognitive test (dual-task gait), and completed walking trials without the cognitive test (single-task gait). Spatial-temporal gait parameters were compared between collision/contact and noncontact athletes using MANCOVAs; cognitive task performance was compared using ANCOVAs. No significant single-task or dual-task gait differences were found between collision/contact and noncontact athletes. Noncontact athletes demonstrated higher cognitive task accuracy during single-task standing (P = .001) and dual-task gait conditions (P = .02) than collision/contact athletes. These data demonstrate the utility of a dual-task gait assessment outside of a laboratory and suggest that preinjury cognitive task performance during dual-tasks may differ between athletes of different sport classifications.
机译:与运动有关的脑震荡后,步态障碍已被记录在案。但是,尚不清楚参加不同运动类别的运动员之间是否存在预先存在的步态模式差异。双任务步态检查可以检测日常任务(例如,步行和思考)的同时执行,并可以使用惯性传感器对步态进行量化。这项研究的目的是比较碰撞/接触和非接触运动员的单项和双项步态表现。一组大学运动员(n = 265)在赛季开始之前在3个机构中接受了测试(平均年龄= 19.1 +/- 1.1岁)。所有参与者保持静止(单任务站立)并步行,同时完成认知测试(双任务步态),并在没有认知测试的情况下完成步行试验(单任务步态)。使用MANCOVA比较了碰撞/接触和非接触运动员的时空步态参数。使用ANCOVA比较认知任务表现。在碰撞/接触和非接触运动员之间没有发现明显的单项或双项步态差异。与接触/接触运动员相比,非接触运动员在单项站立(P = .001)和双任务步态(P = .02)时表现出更高的认知任务准确性。这些数据证明了在实验室外进行双任务步态评估的效用,并表明在双任务期间受伤前认知任务的表现在不同运动类别的运动员之间可能有所不同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Applied Biomechanics》 |2017年第1期|24-31|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Micheli Ctr Sports Injury Prevent, Waltham, MA 02453 USA|Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Div Sports Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA|Boston Childrens Hosp, Brain Injury Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA;

    Univ Delaware, Dept Kinesiol & Appl Physiol, Newark, DE USA|Univ Delaware, Interdisciplinary Program Biomech & Movement Sci, Newark, DE USA;

    Elon Univ, Dept Phys Therapy Educ, Elon, NC USA;

    Elon Univ, Dept Exercise Sci, Elon, NC USA;

    Elon Univ, Dept Exercise Sci, Elon, NC USA;

    Micheli Ctr Sports Injury Prevent, Waltham, MA 02453 USA|Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Div Sports Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA|Boston Childrens Hosp, Brain Injury Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA|Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA USA|Harvard Med Sch, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA USA;

    Univ Delaware, Dept Kinesiol & Appl Physiol, Newark, DE USA|Univ Delaware, Interdisciplinary Program Biomech & Movement Sci, Newark, DE USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    clinical biomechanics; gait analysis; head injury; sports medicine;

    机译:临床生物力学;步态分析;头部损伤;运动医学;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号