...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry >Analysis of gold nanoparticle mixtures: a comparison of hydrodynamic chromatography (HDC) and asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) coupled to ICP-MS
【24h】

Analysis of gold nanoparticle mixtures: a comparison of hydrodynamic chromatography (HDC) and asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) coupled to ICP-MS

机译:金纳米颗粒混合物的分析:流体动力学色谱法(HDC)与非对称流场流分馏(AF4)与ICP-MS的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Robust methods to detect and characterize engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in environmental samples are an urgent need, particularly given the increasing use of ENPs in consumer products. To be successful, methods should enable differentiation of ENPs from background nanoparticulates and other system components. The element specificity of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) can, to some degree, satisfy this requirement. Given the polydisperse nature of particles in natural systems, combining ICP-MS with a size separation method holds particular promise. This paper compares hydrodynamic chromatography (HDC) and asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation (AF4), both coupled with ICP-MS, in their capacity to detect, quantify, and characterize nanoparticles. The detection limits, resolution, and recoveries for both techniques were determined using gold nanoparticle standards. AF4 is capable of separating mixtures of 5, 20, 50 and 100 nm gold ENPs with significantly greater resolution than HDC, with these resolution differences being most pronounced in the smaller size range. However, HDC recoveries ranged from 77 to 96%, while recovery during AF4 ranged from 4 to 89%. The low AF4 recoveries generally occurred for the largest ENPs at the lowest concentrations examined. The limits of detection for both techniques were found to be approximately 5 Hg L~(-1), however different experimental conditions could lower this value. HDC provides an additional benefit over AF4 by proving capable of separating a dissolved signal from a NP sample.
机译:迫切需要一种可靠的方法来检测和表征环境样品中的工程纳米颗粒(ENP),特别是考虑到消费产品中ENP的使用越来越多。为取得成功,方法应能使ENP与背景纳米颗粒和其他系统组分区分开。电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)的元素特异性在某种程度上可以满足这一要求。鉴于颗粒在自然系统中的多分散性,将ICP-MS与尺寸分离方法结合在一起具有特殊的前景。本文比较了流体动力学色谱法(HDC)和不对称流场流动分馏法(AF4)以及ICP-MS在检测,定量和表征纳米颗粒方面的能力。两种技术的检测限,分离度和回收率均使用金纳米颗粒标准品确定。 AF4能够以比HDC更高的分辨率分离5、20、50和100 nm金ENP的混合物,这些分辨率差异在较小的尺寸范围内最为明显。但是,HDC的回收率为77%至96%,而AF4期间的回收率为4%至89%。对于最大的ENP,在最低的检测浓度下,AF4的回收率通常较低。两种技术的检测极限均约为5 Hg L〜(-1),但是不同的实验条件可能会降低该值。通过证明能够从NP样品中分离出溶解的信号,HDC比AF4更具优势。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry》 |2012年第9期|p.1532-1539|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401-1842, USA;

    School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5306, USA;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401-1842, USA;

    School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5306, USA;

    School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5306, USA;

    Department of Chemistry and Geochemistry, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401-1842, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号