首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Planning Association >Viewpoint:Social Distancing and Cultural Bias: On the Spatiality of COVID-19
【24h】

Viewpoint:Social Distancing and Cultural Bias: On the Spatiality of COVID-19

机译:观点:社会疏散和文化偏见:关于Covid-19的空间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Social distancing (also called physical distancing) is a highly recommended intervention against the community spreading of the new coronavirus. Although social distancing is a prudent intervention, its implications and impacts are not. The new distancing rules affect personal space and create a new sense of what is considered clean or dirty. Mary Douglas, founder of Cultural Theory, has asserted that "dirt" is a social construction that combines a social order with the contravention to this order ("Dirt is matter out of place"). As a social construction, however, "dirt" is subject to cultural bias. To some, disobedience to distancing rules is "dirty" (hierarchist bias); to others, the proximity of strangers or outsiders (egalitarian bias); to a third group, the duty to wear masks and other restrictions to personal liberty (individualist bias). Social biases shape the spatial consequences of COVID-19 and social distancing. Using cultural bias to examine reactions to social distancing allows identifying possible components of a clumsy, yet viable response to the COVID-19 crisis.
机译:社会疏远(也称为物理疏远)是强烈建议对新冠状病毒的社区传播的干预。虽然社会疏散是谨慎的干预,但其影响和影响不是。新的疏散规则会影响个人空间,并创造一个新的感觉被认为是干净或肮脏的。文化理论的创始人玛丽道格拉斯已断言,“污垢”是一个社会建筑,将社会秩序与此订单违反(“污垢失效”)。然而,作为社会建设,“污垢”受到文化偏见的影响。对某些人来说,不服从疏远的规则是“肮脏”(分层偏见);对他人来说,陌生人或外人的邻近(平等主义偏见);对于第三组,戴上面具的责任和对个人自由(个人主义偏见)的其他限制。社会偏见塑造了Covid-19和社会疏散的空间后果。使用文化偏见来检查对社会疏散的反应,允许识别对Covid-19危机的笨拙而且可行的反应的可能组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号