首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association >Determination of Formaldehyde Content in Leather: EN ISO 17226 Standard. Influence of the Agitation Method Used in the Initial Phase of Formaldehyde Extraction
【24h】

Determination of Formaldehyde Content in Leather: EN ISO 17226 Standard. Influence of the Agitation Method Used in the Initial Phase of Formaldehyde Extraction

机译:皮革中甲醛含量的测定:EN ISO 17226标准。搅拌方法对甲醛提取初期的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Given the carcinogenic character of formaldehyde, it should be reliably determined in any substrate. The EN ISO 17226 Standard is the Official Method to quantify formaldehyde in leather. However, some misunderstandings may arise from the practical conditions given by the Standard for the extraction of formaldehyde. Two agitation methods (magnetic agitation and reciprocal linear agitation), which fulfill the conditions of the Standard, have been used for the extraction of formaldehyde in twenty two samples of wet-blue split leather treated with resins synthesized with formaldehyde and with/without the addition of vegetable compounds. The agitation method influences the formaldehyde content and differences between the agitation methods depend on the formaldehyde resins and vegetable compounds applied. Magnetic agitation leads to formaldehyde contents that are 26% greater than those obtained when the reciprocal linear agitation method is used. Major brands specify allowable limits for formaldehyde content, which depend on the user (adult or babies) and whether the article is in direct contact with the skin. A high percentage of disagreement (33.3%) has been observed between the agitation methods in fulfilling the allowable limits. One-third of the formaldehyde content results that fulfilled the allowable limits with the reciprocal linear agitation method failed when the magnetic method was applied. The situation urges the clarification of the shaking method in the EN ISO 17226 Standard to avoid the high level of contradictory results between methods that meet the agitation conditions of the Standard.
机译:鉴于甲醛的致癌特性,应在任何底物中可靠地确定它。 EN ISO 17226标准是定量皮革中甲醛的官方方法。但是,由标准规定的提取甲醛的实际条件可能会引起一些误解。满足标准条件的两种搅拌方法(磁力搅拌和线性往复搅拌)已用于从22个湿甲醛分离皮革样品中提取甲醛,该样品经过甲醛合成树脂处理,有/无添加蔬菜化合物。搅拌方法影响甲醛含量,并且搅拌方法之间的差异取决于所使用的甲醛树脂和植物化合物。磁力搅拌导致甲醛含量比使用双向往复搅拌方法获得的甲醛含量高26%。主要品牌规定了甲醛含量的允许极限,这取决于使用者(成人或婴儿)以及制品是否直接与皮肤接触。在达到允许的极限时,在搅拌方法之间观察到很大的分歧(33.3%)。当采用磁力法时,往复线性搅拌法不能达到允许限值的三分之一甲醛含量失败。这种情况要求在EN ISO 17226标准中阐明摇晃方法,以避免在满足标准搅拌条件的方法之间出现高度矛盾的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号