首页> 外文期刊>Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing >Multi-objective power scheduling problem in smart homes using grey wolf optimiser
【24h】

Multi-objective power scheduling problem in smart homes using grey wolf optimiser

机译:使用灰狼优化器的智能家居多目标电力调度问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, the multi-objective grey wolf optimiser is utilised for the power scheduling problem (PSP). The grey wolf optimiser (GWO) is a recent swarm-based optimisation algorithm tailored for various optimisation problems. PSP is addressed by scheduling home appliances to a certain time horizon to minimise the electricity bill and peak-to-average ratio (PAR) and increase the comfort level of users. The multi-objective function is formalised and utilised in GWO to obtain an optimal schedule. Seven consumption profiles and seven real-time electricity prices with various characteristics are considered to evaluate the proposed multi-objective GWO. The performance of the proposed algorithm is tested against three factors, namely, electricity bill, PAR and user comfort level. The obtained schedule shows that all evaluation factors are optimally timetabled. For a comparative evaluation, the proposed method is firstly compared with the genetic algorithm. The proposed method exhibits and yield better performance than GA under the same consumption profiles. Secondly, the proposed method is compared with 19 state-of-the-art methods by using the recommended consumption profiles of these methods and their evaluation criteria. The proposed method nearly outperforms the compared methods in terms of minimisation of electricity bill and PAR. User comfort level is a criterion proposed in this study and has not been considered previously. It exerts a significant impact on the final schedule.
机译:本文将多目标灰狼优化器用于功率调度问题(PSP)。灰太狼优化器(GWO)是针对各种优化问题而量身定制的最新基于群体的优化算法。通过将家用电器安排在一定的时间范围内来解决PSP问题,以最大程度地减少电费和峰均比(PAR)并提高用户的舒适度。将多目标函数形式化,并在GWO中加以利用以获得最佳调度。考虑了七个具有不同特征的消耗曲线和七个实时电价,以评估提出的多目标GWO。针对三种因素,即电费,PAR和用户舒适度,对所提算法的性能进行了测试。所获得的进度表显示所有评估因素均已达到最佳时间表。为了进行比较评估,首先将该方法与遗传算法进行了比较。在相同的消耗曲线下,所提出的方法具有比GA更好的性能。其次,通过使用推荐的这些方法的消耗曲线及其评估标准,将该方法与19种最新方法进行了比较。在电费和PAR最小化方面,所提出的方法几乎优于比较方法。用户舒适度是这项研究中提出的标准,以前未曾考虑过。它对最终进度表产生重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号