首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Aircraft >Time-Domain Training Signals Comparison for Computational Fluid Dynamics Based Aerodynamic Identification
【24h】

Time-Domain Training Signals Comparison for Computational Fluid Dynamics Based Aerodynamic Identification

机译:基于计算流体动力学的气动识别时域训练信号比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Three classes of input training signals are evaluated for computational fluid dynamics based aeroelastic prediction performance. Binary signals, frequency sweeps, and multisines are reviewed and evaluated for aeroelastic prediction performance. Aerodynamic requirements are developed for input signal design and implementation. The input training signals are evaluated with signal property analysis and aeroelastic stability predictions. Five specific input signals were tested with the AGARD 445.6 aeroelastic testcase at Mach 0.90. The signals are the binary 3211 multistep, the frequency swept chirp, the frequency swept offset dc-chirp, the frequency swept Fresnel chirp and the multisine Schroeder sweep. The offset dc-chirp gave the best performance.
机译:针对基于计算流体动力学的气动弹性预测性能,评估了三类输入的训练信号。审查并评估了二进制信号,扫频和正弦波的气动弹性预测性能。针对输入信号的设计和实现开发了空气动力学要求。输入的训练信号通过信号属性分析和气动弹性稳定性预测进行评估。使用AGARD 445.6气动弹性测试箱以0.9马赫的速度测试了五个特定的输入信号。信号为二进制3211多步,扫频sw,扫频偏移dc-chirp,扫频菲涅耳chi和多正弦Schroeder扫频。偏置直流-提供了最佳性能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Aircraft》 |2005年第2期|p.421-428|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 航空;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:33:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号