首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Aircraft >CFL3D/OVERFLOW Results for DLR-F6 Wing/Body and Drag Prediction Workshop Wing
【24h】

CFL3D/OVERFLOW Results for DLR-F6 Wing/Body and Drag Prediction Workshop Wing

机译:DLR-F6机翼/阻力预测车间机翼的CFL3D / OVERFLOW结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A series of overset grids was generated in response to the Third AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop (DPW-III) which preceded the 25th Applied Aerodynamics Conference in June 2006. DPW-III focused on accurate drag prediction for wing/body and wing-alone configurations. The grid series built for each configuration consists of a coarse, medium, fine, and extra-fine mesh. The medium mesh is first constructed using the current state of best practices for overset grid generation. The medium mesh is then coarsened and enhanced by applying a factor of 1.5 to each (I, J, K) dimension. The resulting set of parametrically equivalent grids increase in size by a factor of roughly 3.5 from one level to the next denser level. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed on the overset grids using two different Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow solvers: CFL3D and OVERFLOW. The results were postprocessed using Richardson extrapolation to approximate grid-converged values of lift, drag, pitching moment, and angle of attack at the design condition. This technique appears to work well if the solution does not contain large regions of separated flow (similar to that seen in the DLR-F6 results) and appropriate grid densities are selected. The extra-fine grid data helped to establish asymptotic grid convergence for both the OVERFLOW FX2B wing/body results and the OVERFLOW DPW-W1/W2 wing-alone results. More CFL3D data are needed to establish grid convergence trends. The medium grid was used beyond the grid convergence study by running each configuration at several angles of attack so drag polars and lift/pitching moment curves could be evaluated. The alpha sweep results are used to compare data across configurations as well as across flow solvers. With the exception of the wing/body drag polar, the two codes compare well qualitatively showing consistent incremental trends and similar wing pressure comparisons.
机译:为响应于2006年6月举行的第25届应用空气动力学会议之前的第三届AIAA CFD阻力预测研讨会(DPW-III),生成了一系列的偏距网格。DPW-III专注于机翼/机体和仅机翼构型的精确阻力预测。为每种配置构建的网格系列由粗,中,细和超细网格组成。首先使用当前最佳实践状态构建中等网格,以生成过度的网格。然后,通过对每个(I,J,K)尺寸应用1.5倍的系数来粗化和增强中等网格。所得到的一组参数等效网格的大小从一个级别到下一个更密集的级别增加了大约3.5倍。使用两个不同的雷诺平均Navier-Stokes流动求解器:CFL3D和OVERFLOW,在过顶网格上进行了计算流体动力学模拟。使用理查森外推法对结果进行后处理,以近似得出设计条件下的升力,阻力,俯仰力矩和攻角的网格收敛值。如果解决方案不包含大面积的分离流(类似于DLR-F6结果中所示),并且选择了适当的网格密度,则此技术似乎效果很好。超细网格数据有助于建立OVERFLOW FX2B机翼/机体结果和OVERFLOW DPW-W1 / W2机翼单独结果的渐近网格收敛性。建立网格收敛趋势需要更多的CFL3D数据。在网格收敛研究之外,还通过在几种迎角下运行每种配置来使用中型网格,因此可以评估阻力极和升/俯仰力矩曲线。 Alpha扫描结果用于比较各种配置以及各种流量求解器的数据。除了机翼/机体的极地阻力外,这两个代码在质量上进行了很好的比较,显示出一致的增量趋势和相似的机翼压力比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号