...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Aircraft >Comparison Study of Drag Prediction by Structured and Unstructured Mesh Method
【24h】

Comparison Study of Drag Prediction by Structured and Unstructured Mesh Method

机译:结构化和非结构化网格法预测阻力的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Comparison study of computations for the Third AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop is performed on the DLR-F6 wing-body configurations with and without the wing-body fairing using the structured grid solver UPACS and unstructured grid solver TAS code. Grid convergence study at a fixed C_L using a family of three difference density grids and the results by α sweep are discussed. The self-made multiblock structured grids and mixed-element unstructured grids are employed. Another participant's grid is also compared. Comparisons between the two codes are conducted using the same turbulence model. Moreover, the detailed comparisons are conducted on the grid topology at the corner of the wing-body junction, the turbulence models, and the thin-layer approximation in viscous terms using the multiblock structured grids. The reconstruction schemes to realize the second-order spatial accuracy are also compared on unstructured grids. By comparing the results, the sensitivity of drag prediction to these factors is discussed.
机译:使用结构化网格求解器UPACS和非结构化网格求解器TAS代码,对有无翼体整流罩的DLR-F6机翼构型进行了第三次AIAA计算流体动力学阻力预测研讨会的计算比较研究。讨论了使用三个差分密度栅格族在固定C_L下的栅格收敛性研究,并讨论了α扫描的结果。使用自制的多块结构化网格和混合元素非结构化网格。还比较了另一个参与者的网格。使用相同的湍流模型对两个代码进行比较。此外,使用多块结构化网格对机翼-机体接合处拐角处的网格拓扑,湍流模型以及粘性方面的薄层近似进行了详细的比较。在非结构化网格上还比较了用于实现二阶空间精度的重构方案。通过比较结果,讨论了阻力预测对这些因素的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号