...
机译:惰质石吸附剂与常规吸附剂的分析比较
Department ofCivil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA;
Department ofCivil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA;
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, 406 Nedderman Hall,Box 19308, Arlington, TX 76019, USA;
Department of Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, USA;
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA;
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA;
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA;
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA;
机译:Cu-BTC和常规吸附剂在压力波动吸附中使用氢气纯化的新组合的研究
机译:使用MFI吸附剂从ABE模型发酵液中回收丁醇:传统微珠和薄膜形式的结构化吸附剂之间的比较(第22卷,第205页,2016年)
机译:使用MFI吸附剂从ABE模型发酵液中回收丁醇:传统微珠和薄膜状结构吸附剂之间的比较
机译:惰质衍生吸附剂与常规吸附剂的分析和比较
机译:从水中去除Pb(II)和As(V):使用不同吸附剂的比较研究
机译:不同类型的口腔吸附治疗对慢性肾病患者的比较:多中心随机IV期临床试验
机译:错误的:使用MFI吸附剂的模型发酵肉汤从模型中恢复丁醇:传统珠粒与薄膜形式的结构化吸附剂之间的比较