...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Transport Management >Chapter 11 and the level playing field: Should chapter 11 be considered as a subsidy?
【24h】

Chapter 11 and the level playing field: Should chapter 11 be considered as a subsidy?

机译:第11章和公平竞争环境:是否应将第11章视为补贴?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper assesses whether Chapter 11 is a form of subsidy for US airlines. US airlines have used Chapter 11 to restructure their operations. This has been criticized as a subsidy by major non US airlines and governments for a long time and recently, in the “level playing field” debate. Applying legal and economic perspectives of subsidy, we examine the different opportunities of Chapter 11 to reduce airlines’ costs. It is argued that most of the forms available, such as the modification of collective bargaining, do not constitute a subsidy. Only the termination of pension plans might involve a subsidy, but only using a legal definition of doubtful relevance since there is normally no use of public funds.
机译:本文评估了第11章是否是对美国航空公司的一种补贴形式。美国航空公司已使用第11章来重组其运营。长期以来,近来在“公平竞争环境”辩论中,这一直被非美国主要航空公司和政府批评为补贴。运用法律和经济补贴的观点,我们研究了第11章降低航空公司成本的各种机会。有人认为,大多数可用形式,例如集体谈判的修改,都不构成补贴。只有终止退休金计划才可能涉及补贴,但只能使用具有可疑相关性的法律定义,因为通常不使用公共资金。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号