首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >TORTS—AVIATION SAFETY RATINGS AS DEFAMATION: AVIATION CHARTER, INC. V. AVIATION RESEARCH GROUP/US
【24h】

TORTS—AVIATION SAFETY RATINGS AS DEFAMATION: AVIATION CHARTER, INC. V. AVIATION RESEARCH GROUP/US

机译:侵权行为—航空安全等级的毁灭:AVIATION CHARTER,INC。V. AVIATION RESEARCH GROUP / US

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the recent case of Aviation Charter, Inc. v. Aviation Research Group/US, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that the First Amendment protected an aviation safety rating published in a newspaper article because it was a subjective assessment incapable of being proved true or false. While a state may choose to extend protection to the safety rating published in this case, the First Amendment does not require such a result. The Eighth Circuit too narrowly construes the Supreme Court's holding that an opinion can imply a false assertion of fact in the seminal case analyzing opinion as defamation, Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.
机译:在最近的《 Aviation Charter Inc.诉航空研究小组/美国案》中,美国第八巡回上诉法院裁定,《第一修正案》保护报纸上发表的航空安全等级,因为这是一项主观评估,不能被证明是对还是错。虽然州可以选择将保护范围扩展到在这种情况下发布的安全等级,但第一修正案不需要这样的结果。第八巡回法院过于狭义地解释了最高法院的以下观点:在Milkovich诉Lorain Journal Co.一案中,将开创性的案例分析为诽谤,将意见隐含事实事实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号