首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >DISCRIMINATORY DEPLANING: AVIATION SECURITY AND THE CONSTITUTION
【24h】

DISCRIMINATORY DEPLANING: AVIATION SECURITY AND THE CONSTITUTION

机译:歧视性降级:航空保安与组织

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The previous sections indicate at least two viable avenues for finding state action in a pilot's discriminatory deplaning: public function and joint action. The 2001 Act was so comprehensive in scope and detail that it is plausible that the federal government has adopted aviation security as a public function. Pilots operating under that authority then become natural extensions of that authority. Alternatively, several examples borne out of recent cases indicate that pilots are often acting in concert with local law enforcement, blurring the lines between private and public actors. A continued refusal of courts to recognize such joint action effectively immunizes pilots' actions from constitutional scrutiny.
机译:前面的部分指出了在飞行员的歧视性脱机中找到国家行动的至少两个可行途径:公共职能和联合行动。 2001年法案的范围和细节如此全面,以至于联邦政府已将航空保安作为一项公共职能来采用是合理的。然后,在该权限下运行的飞行员自然成为该权限的扩展。另外,从最近的案例中可以看出的几个例子表明,飞行员经常与当地执法部门合作,模糊了私人和公共行为者之间的界限。法院继续拒绝承认这种联合行动有效地使飞行员的行动不受宪法审查。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Air Law and Commerce》 |2014年第1期|113-147|共35页
  • 作者

    Nicholas Poppe;

  • 作者单位

    University of Denver Sturm College of Law;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:08:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号