首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >AIRPORT SECURITY SCREENERS: IN YOUR FACE AND ABOVE THE LAW
【24h】

AIRPORT SECURITY SCREENERS: IN YOUR FACE AND ABOVE THE LAW

机译:机场安全检查员:面对法律

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

TN VANDERKLOK V. UNITED STATES, the Third Circuit ad- Xdressed the issue of whether a First Amendment claim for retaliatory prosecution could be brought against an agent of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in the context of airport security screenings—a question of first impression. Any action brought under the Constitution against a federal official is known as a Bivens action. In Vanderklok, the Third Circuit declined to extend the coverage of a Bivens action to include a remedy against TSA screeners who retaliate against a traveler who exercises their First Amendment rights.
机译:TN VANDERKLOK V.美国,第三巡回法院提出了以下问题:在机场安全检查的背景下,是否可以对运输安全管理局(TSA)的代理人提出针对报复性起诉的第一修正案索赔?印象。根据《宪法》对联邦官员采取的任何行动被称为“比文斯行动”。在范德克(Vanderklok),第三巡回法院拒绝扩大Bivens行动的范围,以包括针对TSA筛查者的报复,该报复是对行使其第一修正案权利的旅行者进行报复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号