首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Advanced Transportation >Pruning and ranking the Pareto optimal set, application for the dynamic multi-objective network design problem
【24h】

Pruning and ranking the Pareto optimal set, application for the dynamic multi-objective network design problem

机译:修剪和排列Pareto最优集,用于动态多目标网络设计问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Solving the multi-objective network design problem (MONDP) resorts to a Pareto optimal set. This set can provide additional information like trade-offs between objectives for the decision making process, which is not available if the compensation principle would be chosen in advance. However, the Pareto optimal set of solutions can become large, especially if the objectives are mainly opposed. As a consequence, the Pareto optimal set may become difficult to analyze and to comprehend. In this case, pruning and ranking becomes attractive to reduce the Pareto optimal set and to rank the solutions to assist the decision maker. Because the method used, may influence the eventual decisions taken, it is important to choose a method that corresponds best with the underlying decision process and is in accordance with the qualities of the data used. We provided a review of some methods to prune and rank the Pareto optimal set to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of these methods. The methods are applied using the outcome of solving the dynamic MONDP in which minimizing externalities of traffic are the objectives, and dynamic traffic management measures are the decision variables. For this, we solved the dynamic MONDP for a realistic network of the city Almelo in the Netherlands using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm EL For ranking, we propose to use a fuzzy outranking method that can take uncertainties regarding the data quality and the perception of decision makers into account; and for pruning, a method that explicitly reckons with significant trade-offs has been identified as the more suitable method to assist the decision making process.
机译:解决多目标网络设计问题(MONDP)依赖于Pareto最优集。该集合可以提供其他信息,例如决策过程目标之间的折衷,如果提前选择补偿原则,则该信息不可用。但是,帕累托最优解集会变得很大,尤其是在主要反对目标的情况下。结果,帕累托最优集可能变得难以分析和理解。在这种情况下,修剪和排序对于减小Pareto最优集合并对解决方案进行排序以帮助决策者具有吸引力。由于所使用的方法可能会影响最终的决策,因此选择与基础决策过程最相符并且与所用数据的质量一致的方法非常重要。我们提供了一些修剪和排列帕累托最优集的方法的概述,以说明这些方法的优缺点。这些方法的使用是基于解决动态MONDP的结果,其中以减少交通外部性为目标,而动态交通管理措施是决策变量。为此,我们使用非主导的排序遗传算法EL解决了荷兰城市Almelo的一个现实网络的动态MONDP。为了进行排名,我们建议使用模糊排名方法,该方法可以考虑数据质量和感知的不确定性决策者的考虑;对于修剪,已经确定了一种明显考虑到重大折衷的方法,它是辅助决策过程的更合适的方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Advanced Transportation》 |2014年第6期|588-607|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Goudappel Coffeng, Deventer, The Netherlands,Centre for Transport Studies, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands,Transport Innovation and Modelling, Goudappel Coffeng BV, PO Box 217, 7400 AD Deventer, The Netherlands;

    Goudappel Coffeng, Deventer, The Netherlands,Centre for Transport Studies, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands;

    Centre for Transport Studies, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands;

    Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    multi-objective network design problem; externalities; dynamic traffic management; pruning; ranking;

    机译:多目标网络设计问题;外部性;动态交通管理;修剪排行;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:12:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号