首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Advanced Transportation >A Comparison Analysis of Surrogate Safety Measures with Car-Following Perspectives for Advanced Driver Assistance System
【24h】

A Comparison Analysis of Surrogate Safety Measures with Car-Following Perspectives for Advanced Driver Assistance System

机译:先进驾驶辅助系统的汽车安全性与替代安全措施的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Surrogate Safety Measure (SSM) is one of the most widely used methods for identifying future threats, such as rear-end collision. Various SSMs have been proposed for the application of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), including Forward Collision Warning System (FCWS) and Emergency Braking System (EBS). The existing SSMs have been mainly used for assessing criticality of a certain traffic situation or detecting critical actions, such as severe braking maneuvers and jerking before an accident. The ADAS shows different warning signals or movements from drivers' driving behaviours depending on the SSM employed in the system, which may lead to low reliability and low satisfaction. In order to explore the characteristics of existing SSMs in terms of human driving behaviours, this study analyzes collision risks estimated by three different SSMs, including Time-To-Collision (TTC), Stopping headway Distance (SHD), and Deceleration-based Surrogate Safety Measure (DSSM), based on two different car-following theories, such as action point model and asymmetric driving behaviour model. 'Ihe results show that the estimated collision risks of the TTC and SHD only partially match the pattern of human driving behaviour. Furthermore, the TTC and SHD overestimate the collision risk in deceleration process, particularly when the subject vehicle is faster than its preceding vehicle. On the other hand, the DSSM shows well-matched results to the pattern of the human driving behaviour. It well represents the collision risk even when the preceding vehicle moves faster than the follower one. Moreover, unlike other SSMs, the DSSM shows a balanced performance to estimate the collision risk in both deceleration and acceleration phase. These research findings suggest that the DSSM has a great potential to enhance the driver's compliance to the ADAS, since it can reflect how the driver perceives the collision risks according to the driving behaviours in the car-following situation.
机译:替代安全措施(SSM)是识别未来威胁(例如追尾事故)的最广泛使用的方法之一。已经提出了各种用于高级驾驶员辅助系统(ADAS)的SSM,包括前撞预警系统(FCWS)和紧急制动系统(EBS)。现有的SSM主要用于评估某种交通状况的严重性或检测关键动作,例如严重的制动动作和事故发生前的颠簸。根据系统中采用的SSM,ADAS显示的警告信号或驾驶员驾驶行为的不同动作,可能导致可靠性低和满意度低。为了探讨现有SSM在人类驾驶行为方面的特征,本研究分析了三种不同SSM估计的碰撞风险,包括碰撞时间(TTC),停止行进距离(SHD)和基于减速度的替代安全性基于两种不同的跟车理论(例如动作点模型和非对称驾驶行为模型)的度量(DSSM)。 “结果表明,TTC和SHD的估计碰撞风险仅部分符合人类驾驶行为的模式。此外,TTC和SHD高估了减速过程中的碰撞风险,特别是当目标车辆比其前一辆车辆快时。另一方面,DSSM显示出与人类驾驶行为模式相匹配的结果。即使前面的车辆比跟随的车辆移动得快,它也很好地表示了碰撞风险。此外,与其他SSM不同,DSSM在减速和加速阶段均显示出平衡的性能来估计碰撞风险。这些研究结果表明,DSSM具有很大的潜力,可以提高驾驶员对ADAS的依从性,因为它可以根据驾驶员在跟车情况下的驾驶行为来反映驾驶员如何感知碰撞风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Advanced Transportation》 |2018年第6期|8040815.1-8040815.14|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Korea Transportat Inst KOTI Dept Ind Revolut & Transport 4 Sejong South Korea;

    Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol Dept Civil & Environm Engn Daejeon South Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 05:03:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号