首页> 外文期刊>Journal of accounting and public policy >Are required SEC proxy disclosures about the board's role in risk oversight substantive?
【24h】

Are required SEC proxy disclosures about the board's role in risk oversight substantive?

机译:是否需要SEC代理披露关于董事会在风险监督实质性中的作用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires companies it regulates to include disclosures about the board's role in risk oversight in the annual proxy statement to shareholders. The SEC does not mandate specific content or actions that boards should perform as part of their risk oversight responsibilities, leaving the nature of activities and extent of those disclosures to the discretion of the reporting entity. This study examines whether these disclosures contain substantive information reflective of the effectiveness of the organization's risk oversight. We find that organizations disclosing more specific information (but not simply more information) about board risk oversight practices are associated with firms independently assessed as having the strongest management and governance processes. These findings suggest that these firms use the discretion provided by the SEC's disclosure rule to provide substantive and potentially value-relevant information for stakeholders about the entity's risk management processes and board risk oversight activities.
机译:美国证券和交易所委员会(股票)要求公司规定,包括关于董事会在股东年度代理陈述中风险监督中的作用的披露。证券委员会不授权董事会应作为其风险监督责任的一部分履行的具体内容或行动,使活动的性质和这些披露的性质与报告实体自行决定。本研究探讨了这些披露是否包含反映组织风险监督的有效性的实质性信息。我们发现,关于董事会风险监督实践的更多特定信息(但不仅仅是更多信息)与拥有最强的管理和治理流程的公司有关的企业有关。这些调查结果表明,这些公司使用SEC披露规则提供的自由裁量权,为实体的风险管理流程和董事会风险监督活动提供有关利益攸关方的实质性和潜在价值相关信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号