首页> 外文期刊>Journal of accounting and public policy >The use and consequences of perquisite types in nonprofit organizations
【24h】

The use and consequences of perquisite types in nonprofit organizations

机译:非营利组织在非营利组织中的使用和后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We document perquisite use in the nonprofit sector, the determinants of that use, and the ensuing consequences. Relative to the for-profit sector, the nonprofit sector is characterized by a lack of residual ownership rights and less detailed disclosure requirements, factors that have the potential to influence this piece of the compensation package. Using a sample of over 126,000 organization-year observations from 2008 to 2018, we document that approximately 24% of organizations report providing one or more of their executives with perquisites. We find that perks are more likely in larger nonprofits with excess endowments and fewer governance policies, and less likely at organizations with more outside monitors. We also find that perk disclosure has a negative impact on future donations. However, when we decompose our analysis by type of perk, we find evidence that some perks have a positive effect on future donations. Our results are robust to a variety of alternative formulations and provide useful insights for nonprofit regulators, boards, and donors. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:我们在非营利组织,该使用的决定因素和随后的后果中记录了在非营利组织的疑虑。相对于营利部门,非营利性部门的特点是缺乏剩余所有权和更少详细的披露要求,有可能影响这一薪酬包的因素。我们从2008年到2018年使用超过126,000个组织年度观测的样本,我们记录了大约24%的组织报告提供了一个或多个主管,并提供了一个或多个高管。我们发现津贴更有可能具有较大的非营利组织,具有多余的禀赋和更少的治理政策,而且在具有更多外部监视器的组织中的可能性不太可能。我们还发现Perk披露对未来捐款产生负面影响。但是,当我们通过津贴类型分解我们的分析时,我们发现有证据表明有些津贴有对未来捐款的积极影响。我们的结果对各种替代配方具有强大,并为非生产监管机构,董事会和捐助者提供有用的见解。 (c)2020 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号